【问题标题】:mock-maker-inline makes test fail with "NotAMockException Argument passed to Mockito.mockingDetails() should be a mock" on non-final non-static classmock-maker-inline 使测试失败,并在非最终非静态类上“传递给 Mockito.mockingDetails() 的 NotAMockException 参数应该是一个模拟”
【发布时间】:2020-07-13 09:06:29
【问题描述】:

我有一个 JUnit 测试,其中有 5 个模拟,其中一个模拟类是最终的,我启用了 mock-maker-inline 来克服这个问题,现在测试通过了,但在测试执行结束时,我也得到 NotAMockException:

org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.NotAMockException: Argument passed to Mockito.mockingDetails() should be a mock, but is an instance of class ...Locals!
at org.mockito.internal.runners.DefaultInternalRunner$1$2.testFinished(DefaultInternalRunner.java:63)
    at org.junit.runner.notification.SynchronizedRunListener.testFinished(SynchronizedRunListener.java:56)
    at org.junit.runner.notification.RunNotifier$7.notifyListener(RunNotifier.java:190)
    at org.junit.runner.notification.RunNotifier$SafeNotifier.run(RunNotifier.java:72)
    at org.junit.runner.notification.RunNotifier.fireTestFinished(RunNotifier.java:187)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.model.EachTestNotifier.fireTestFinished(EachTestNotifier.java:38)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:331)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
    at org.mockito.internal.runners.DefaultInternalRunner$1.run(DefaultInternalRunner.java:74)
    at org.mockito.internal.runners.DefaultInternalRunner.run(DefaultInternalRunner.java:80)
    at org.mockito.internal.runners.StrictRunner.run(StrictRunner.java:39)
    at org.mockito.junit.MockitoJUnitRunner.run(MockitoJUnitRunner.java:163)
    at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
...

模拟很简单:

    @Mock
    private Locals locals; //class

    @Mock
    private Globals globals; // class

    @Mock
    private Cache cache; // interface

    @Mock
    private Reminds reminds; // final class

    @Mock
    private Employeereminds employeereminds; // class

... 后跟几个 when().thenReturn() 设置以使其协同工作

在测试期间模拟如下:

locals = {Locals@3233} 
globals = {Globals@3234} 
cache = {Cache$MockitoMock$665734991@3237} "cache"
reminds = {Reminds@3235} 
employeereminds = {Employeereminds@3236} 

我正在使用 Mockito 2.25.0 也尝试过 2.28.2 但没有区别。

我可以重构我的测试来测试最终课程的内容,但我更喜欢隔离我的测试。我也可以使用 powermock,但也看到过使用 powermock 报告的类似问题。

是否有人偶然发现了此类问题并找到了不错的解决方法?

编辑:我做了更多调查,我删除了 Locals Mock 并在 Globals mock 上遇到了同样的错误。然后我删除了Globals 模拟并得到(!?)以下异常(@ v2.28.2):

org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.NotAMockException: Argument passed to Mockito.mockingDetails() should be a mock, but is an instance of class Cache$MockitoMock$149288076!

    at org.mockito.internal.runners.DefaultInternalRunner$1$2.testFinished(DefaultInternalRunner.java:63)
    at org.junit.runner.notification.SynchronizedRunListener.testFinished(SynchronizedRunListener.java:56)
    at org.junit.runner.notification.RunNotifier$7.notifyListener(RunNotifier.java:190)
    at org.junit.runner.notification.RunNotifier$SafeNotifier.run(RunNotifier.java:72)
    at org.junit.runner.notification.RunNotifier.fireTestFinished(RunNotifier.java:187)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.model.EachTestNotifier.fireTestFinished(EachTestNotifier.java:38)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:331)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
    at org.mockito.internal.runners.DefaultInternalRunner$1.run(DefaultInternalRunner.java:74)
    at org.mockito.internal.runners.DefaultInternalRunner.run(DefaultInternalRunner.java:80)
    at org.mockito.internal.runners.StrictRunner.run(StrictRunner.java:39)
    at org.mockito.junit.MockitoJUnitRunner.run(MockitoJUnitRunner.java:163)
    at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
    ...

【问题讨论】:

  • 现在我从 Strict 切换到 Silent runner,但这不是我喜欢的解决方案。
  • 你能展示一下 Locals 类和它的测试吗?
  • 嗨,我从测试中排除了一些问题以查明问题,它似乎并不特定于 Locals 类,因为它几乎在每个模拟中都会出现,甚至抱怨 Cache 应该是模拟但它是Cache$MockitoMock$149288076

标签: java junit mockito


【解决方案1】:

好的,我发现了问题: 我在调用

Mockito.framework().clearInlineMocks();

@After注解调用的代码中,但正确的方法是在@AfterClass注解调用的代码中进行,否则在您清除模拟后运行Mockito自己的验证。

【讨论】:

  • 谢谢。正在把我的头从墙上砸下来。 @AfterClass void afterClass () { Mockito.framework ().clearInlineMocks (); }
猜你喜欢
  • 1970-01-01
  • 2022-09-23
  • 2015-05-15
  • 1970-01-01
  • 1970-01-01
  • 2018-09-28
  • 2018-11-16
  • 1970-01-01
  • 1970-01-01
相关资源
最近更新 更多