【发布时间】:2019-12-16 14:48:19
【问题描述】:
您好,我想证明计算一维数组中所有值的平均值,
到目前为止,我有以下程序:
#include <stdbool.h>
typedef unsigned int size_t;
typedef struct Average avg;
struct Average
{
bool success;
float average;
};
/*@
axiomatic Float_Div{
logic real f_div(real a,real b) = a/b ;
axiom div:
\forall real q,a,b; 0 != b ==>
(a == b*q <==> q == f_div(a, b));
axiom split :
\forall real q,a,b,c; 0 != b ==>
f_div(a + c , b) == f_div(a,b) + f_div(c,b);
}
axiomatic Average {
logic real average(int * t, integer start, integer stop, integer size);
axiom average_0:
\forall int *t, integer start , integer stop, size;
start >= stop ==> average(t,start, stop, size) == 0;
axiom average_n:
\forall int *t, integer start , integer stop, integer size;
start < stop && size >0 ==>
average(t,start, stop, size) ==
f_div((real)stop-1 ,(real) size) +( average(t,start, stop-1, size) );
axiom average_split :
\forall int *t, integer start ,integer middle, integer stop, integer size;
start < middle < stop && size >0 ==>
average(t,start, stop, size) == average(t,start, middle, size) + average(t,middle, stop, size);
axiom average_unit :
\forall int *t, integer start , integer stop, integer size;
start == stop-1 && size >0 ==>
average(t,start, stop, size) == f_div((real)stop-1 ,(real) size);
}
*/
/*@
requires \valid(array + (0..size-1));
ensures (!\result.success) ==> size == 0 ;
ensures (\result.success) ==> \result.average == average(array, 0, size, size);
assigns \nothing;
*/
avg average(int * array, size_t size){
avg ret;
ret.success = true ;
ret.average = 0 ;
if (size == 0){
ret.success = false;
return ret;
}
float average = 0;
/*@
loop assigns i, average;
loop invariant 0 <= i <= size;
loop invariant average(array , 0, i , size) == average;
*/
for (size_t i = 0 ; i < size ; i ++){
float value = ((float)array[i] / size);
average += value;
}
ret.average = average ;
return ret;
}
frama-c 不能成功证明这个循环不变:
loop invariant average(array , 0, i , size) == average;
我做错了吗? 我不知道我的问题是否来自浮点数的精度。 我尝试了很多断言,但它也不起作用 是不是可以在 Frama-c 中完成?
编辑:
我终于证明了我的功能,我在加和之前先做除法,因为每次我试图先求和时,我都会溢出。
问题是我需要证明我的总和没有溢出。所以我导入了limits.h
并添加一个新的循环不变量:INT_MIN * i <= sum <= INT_MAX * i;
所以我的代码现在看起来像这样:
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <limits.h>
typedef unsigned int size_t;
typedef struct Average avg;
struct Average
{
bool success;
long long average;
};
/*@
axiomatic Sum{
logic integer sum(int * t , integer start, integer end);
axiom sum_false :
\forall int *t, integer start , integer stop;
start >= stop ==> sum(t,start,stop) == 0;
axiom sum_true_start :
\forall int *t, integer start , integer stop;
0 <= start < stop ==>
sum(t,start,stop) == sum(t,start,start+1) + sum(t,start+1,stop);
axiom sum_true_end :
\forall int *t, integer start , integer stop;
0 <= start < stop ==>
sum(t,start,stop) == sum(t,start,stop-1) + sum(t,stop-1,stop);
axiom sum_split :
\forall int *t, integer start , integer stop, integer middle;
0 <= start<= middle < stop ==>
sum(t,start,stop) == sum(t,start,middle) + sum(t,middle,stop);
axiom sum_alone :
\forall int *t, integer start;
(0<=start)
==>
sum(t,start,start+1) == t[start] ;
}
*/
/*@
requires \valid(array + (0..size-1));
ensures (!\result.success) ==> size == 0 ;
ensures (\result.success) ==> (\result.average == sum(array,0,size)/size) ;
assigns \nothing;
*/
avg average(int * array, size_t size){
//we use a structure to be sure that the function finish without error
avg ret;
ret.success = true ;
ret.average = 0 ;
if (size == 0){
//if the size == 0 the function will fail
ret.success = false;
return ret;
}
else{
/*
the average is the sum of all the element of the array divided by the size
An int is between - 2^15-1 and 2^15-1 that imply that the sum of
all the element of an array is between
-2^15 * size and 2^15 * size as size is between 0 and 2^16
the sum is between -2^31 and 2^31
a long long is between -2^63 and 2^63
the sum of all the element can be inside a long long.
*/
long long sum = 0;
/*@
loop assigns i, sum ;
loop invariant 0 <= i <= size;
loop invariant sum == sum(array,0,i);
loop invariant INT_MIN * i <= sum <= INT_MAX * i;
*/
for (size_t i = 0 ; i < size ; i ++){
//@assert INT_MIN * i <= sum <= INT_MAX * i;
sum += array[i];
//@assert i+1 <= size;
//@assert INT_MIN * (i+1) <= sum <= INT_MAX * (i+1);
//@assert ((LLONG_MIN < INT_MIN * size ) && (LLONG_MAX > INT_MAX* size));
//@assert LLONG_MIN <= sum <= LLONG_MAX;
//@assert sum == sum(array,0,i) + array[i];
}
ret.average = sum/size ;
return ret;
}
}
我让断言,但我敢肯定它们中的很多都是无用的。
【问题讨论】:
-
尝试给它一个小的容差值。
fabs(average(...) - average) < epsilon -
也许它不能处理你对函数名和变量名都使用符号
average?如果您不隐藏函数名称,而是为变量使用不同的名称(这也将使您的代码更易于阅读和遵循),会发生什么? -
具有浮点类型的数学通常是不精确的,导致您期望的东西不是很小的数量(舍入误差)。很可能它在抱怨这一点,您应该能够比较“足够接近”而不是完全相等。
-
您能否提供通过 frama-c 运行时获得的完整输出?您得到的确切错误是什么?
-
关于:
typedef unsigned int size_t;size_t类型在头文件stdio.h中定义,定义为:long unsigned int为什么要重新定义它?