【发布时间】:2016-08-04 22:06:38
【问题描述】:
我注意到当使用 glmnet 包在插入符号中运行惩罚逻辑回归时,模型预测被重新分类为 0 或 1 结果:
mydata <- read.csv("http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/data/binary.csv")
train_control <- trainControl(method="cv", number=10, savePredictions = TRUE)
glmnetGrid <- expand.grid(alpha=c(0, .5, 1), lambda=c(.1, 1, 10))
model<- train(as.factor(admit) ~ ., data=mydata, trControl=train_control, method="glmnet", family="binomial", tuneGrid=glmnetGrid, metric="Accuracy", preProcess=c("center","scale"))
model
glmnet
400 samples
3 predictor
2 classes: '0', '1'
Pre-processing: centered (3), scaled (3)
Resampling: Cross-Validated (10 fold)
Summary of sample sizes: 360, 360, 361, 359, 360, 361, ...
Resampling results across tuning parameters:
alpha lambda Accuracy Kappa Accuracy SD Kappa SD
0.0 0.1 0.6923233271 0.09027099758 0.018975211636 0.06988057154
0.0 1.0 0.6825703565 0.00000000000 0.007557700521 0.00000000000
0.0 10.0 0.6825703565 0.00000000000 0.007557700521 0.00000000000
0.5 0.1 0.6825703565 0.00000000000 0.007557700521 0.00000000000
0.5 1.0 0.6825703565 0.00000000000 0.007557700521 0.00000000000
0.5 10.0 0.6825703565 0.00000000000 0.007557700521 0.00000000000
1.0 0.1 0.6825703565 0.00000000000 0.007557700521 0.00000000000
1.0 1.0 0.6825703565 0.00000000000 0.007557700521 0.00000000000
1.0 10.0 0.6825703565 0.00000000000 0.007557700521 0.00000000000
Accuracy was used to select the optimal model using the largest value.
The final values used for the model were alpha = 0 and lambda = 0.1.
> head(model$pred)
pred obs rowIndex alpha lambda Resample
1 0 0 16 0 10 Fold01
2 0 0 17 0 10 Fold01
3 0 0 24 0 10 Fold01
4 0 1 46 0 10 Fold01
5 0 0 69 0 10 Fold01
6 0 0 84 0 10 Fold01
> summary(model$pred)
pred obs rowIndex alpha lambda Resample
0:3576 0:2457 Min. : 1.00 Min. :0.0 Min. : 0.1 Length:3600
1: 24 1:1143 1st Qu.:100.75 1st Qu.:0.0 1st Qu.: 0.1 Class :character
Median :200.50 Median :0.5 Median : 1.0 Mode :character
Mean :200.50 Mean :0.5 Mean : 3.7
3rd Qu.:300.25 3rd Qu.:1.0 3rd Qu.:10.0
Max. :400.00 Max. :1.0 Max. :10.0
是否有可能获得原始预测概率 = exp(logit(y)) 而不是 0/1 预测结果?
【问题讨论】:
-
fyi,强烈建议您不要传入 lambda 的单个值,而是使用 nfolds 参数来选择最佳交叉验证的 lambda。如果您坚持选择 lambda,文档建议您传入 lambda 序列,因为单个值的性能可能会慢得多。
-
@Zelazny7 - 谢谢你的提示!
-
@Zelazny7 - 插入符号的作者在这篇文章中指出插入符号 确实 交叉验证了 alpha 和 lambda:stats.stackexchange.com/questions/69638/… 其中 OP 使用了相同的 expand.grid()我做的语法。在插入符号中运行时,也许不需要使用 glmnet 中的 nfolds 或 foldid 参数?
标签: r prediction logistic-regression r-caret glmnet