【发布时间】:2018-01-22 23:19:36
【问题描述】:
我对 C 非常陌生,但我认为我会在学习基本数据结构的同时学习它。无论如何,我对代码中出现错误的方式/位置感到困惑。
基本上,我遇到了两种不同类型的错误:
- 从堆中减去时出现分段错误(@ 二进制堆长度 2 和 3)。
- Malloc/Realloc 错误,当我添加到二进制堆足以使其长度为 4(及以上),然后减去长度为 2(当我这样做时,我得到一个无效的二进制堆结构@长度 3) )。
基本上,我只是想看看我到底做错了什么来获得这种行为。另外,如果我的代码中有任何令人震惊的地方,我也想知道。
所以,这是我的代码:
void printArray(int array[], int size) {
printf("[");
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
if (i == (size - 1)) {
printf("%d", array[i]);
} else {
printf("%d, ", array[i]);
}
}
printf("]\n");
}
int getLeftChild(int h_array[], int p_index, int size) {
/* Summary: Obtains the `left child` of Parent at given parent index (p_index)
*
* Input: `h_array` - The binary heap
* `p_index` - The index of the parent that we are currently looking at
* `size` - The size of the binary heap.
*
* Return: `0` if the index given points out of bounds of the array. Returns the child of parent at p_index if not
*/
int child = 0;
if (p_index * 2 + 1 < size) {
child = h_array[p_index * 2 + 1];
}
return child;
}
int getRightChild(int h_array[], int p_index, int size) {
/* Summary: Obtains the `right child` of Parent at given parent index (p_index)
*
* Input: `h_array` - The binary heap
* `p_index` - The index of the parent that we are currently looking at
* `size` - The size of the binary heap.
*
* Return: `0` if the index given points out of bounds of the array. Returns the child of parent at p_index if not
*/
int child = 0;
if ((p_index * 2 + 2) < size) {
child = h_array[p_index * 2 + 2];
}
return child;
}
void heapSort(int h_array[], int size, int min_max) {
/* Summary: Performs a heap sort on a binary heap array; parents with 2 children maximum.
* This could be used to implement a priority queue, as the node with the highest (or lowest)
* priority will be at the root of the list.
* Input: `h_array` - the heap array to sort
* `size` - The size of the heap array
* `min_max` - an input that will tell whether or not we want to return a 'maxed', or a 'min'd' binary heap.
* maxed will have highest priority at the root, and min'd will have the lowest priority at the root
*
* Returns: Does not return. Performs all sorting operations on input array.
**/
int parent, leftChild, rightChild, p_holder, i = 0;
while (i < (size / 2)) {
parent = h_array[i];
leftChild = getLeftChild(h_array, i, size);
rightChild = getRightChild(h_array, i, size);
if (min_max == 0 ) {
while (parent < leftChild || parent < rightChild) {
p_holder = parent;
if (parent < leftChild) {
h_array[i] = leftChild;
h_array[(i * 2) + 1] = p_holder;
} else if (parent < rightChild) {
h_array[i] = rightChild;
h_array[(i * 2) + 2] = p_holder;
}
i = 0;
parent = h_array[i];
leftChild = getLeftChild(h_array, i, size);
rightChild = getRightChild(h_array, i, size);
}
i++;
} else {
while ((leftChild != 0 && parent > leftChild) || (rightChild != 0 &&parent > rightChild)) {
p_holder = parent;
if ((leftChild != 0) && parent > leftChild) {
h_array[i] = leftChild;
h_array[(i * 2) + 1] = p_holder;
} else if ((rightChild != 0) && parent > rightChild) {
h_array[i] = rightChild;
h_array[(i * 2) + 2] = p_holder;
}
i = 0;
parent = h_array[i];
leftChild = getLeftChild(h_array, i, size);
rightChild = getRightChild(h_array, i, size);
}
i++;
}
}
}
void heapAdd(int h_array[], int *a_size, int value, int *min_max_ptr) {
/* Summary: Adds a value to the binary heap
* Input: `h_array` - The binary heap array
* `a_size` - The size of the array. A pointer to `size` located in main().
* `value` - The value that is to be inserted in the array
* Returns: Void function. Performs all operations on inputted array.
*/
*a_size += 1;
int * a_copy = h_array;
h_array = realloc(h_array, *a_size * sizeof(int));
memcpy(h_array, a_copy, (*a_size - 2) * sizeof(int));
h_array[*a_size - 1] = value;
heapSort(h_array, *a_size, *min_max_ptr);
}
void heapSub(int h_array[], int *a_size, int *min_max_ptr) {
/* Summary: Subtracts the root value from the binary heap
* Input: `h_array` - The binary heap array
* `a_size` - The size of the array. A pointer to `size` located in main().
* Returns: Void function. Performs all operations on inputted array.
*/
h_array[0] = h_array[*a_size - 1];
int * a_copy = h_array;
h_array = realloc(h_array, *a_size - 1 * sizeof(int));
memcpy(h_array, a_copy, (*a_size - 1) * sizeof(int));
*a_size -= 1; // Put here in order to not do any stupid calculations in the calls.
heapSort(h_array, *a_size, *min_max_ptr);
}
int main(void) {
char * user_input;
int user_value;
int debug = 0;
// min_max = 0 to produce a max-heap, min_max = 1 to produce a min-heap
int min_max = 0;
int *min_max_ptr = &min_max;
int size = 0;
int *size_ptr = &size;
// Binary Heap array, initialized here
int * main_array = malloc(size * sizeof(int));
// Start building binary heap with the following loop.
while (strcmp(user_input, "q") != 0) {
printf("Current Heap:\n");
printArray(main_array, size);
// Debug
if (debug) {
printf("Current Heap Size: %i\n", size);
}
printf("What is your input?: ");
scanf("%s", user_input);
// Debug
if (debug) {
printf("Current user input is: %s\n", user_input);
}
if (strcmp(user_input, "add") == 0) {
printf("What # will you be adding to the heap?: ");
scanf("%i", &user_value);
heapAdd(main_array, size_ptr, user_value, min_max_ptr);
} else if (strcmp(user_input, "sub") == 0) {
printf("Subtracting %i from array\n", main_array[0]);
heapSub(main_array, size_ptr, min_max_ptr);
} else if (strcmp(user_input, "debug") == 0) {
printf("Do you want to toggle debug mode(y/n): ");
scanf("%s", user_input);
if (strcmp(user_input, "y") == 0) {
debug = (debug == 0) ? 1 : 0;
printf("Debug is: %i", debug);
} else {
continue;
}
} else {
printf("Incorrect Input, please read the instructions more\n\n");
}
printf("\n");
}
free(main_array);
return 0;
}
这就是代码,下面是测试用例:
- 从堆中减去最大值@length = 2 test case 1
- 从堆中减去最大值,从 @length = 4 开始,到 length = 2 test case 2
之后,似乎所有其他测试用例都可以正常工作(过去的长度 = 4,我可以很好地从二进制堆中添加和减去,并且排序过程效果很好)。谢谢你的帮助:)
【问题讨论】:
-
1)
while (strcmp(user_input, "q") != 0) {这使用未初始化的变量user_input。scanf("%s", user_input);是一样的。 -
您在函数中重新分配,但该指针丢失了,因为它没有在任何地方返回,之后您可能会继续使用旧的未分配内存区域。这很可能会导致您的问题。使用调试器单步调试您的代码。
-
您可能还想在
valgrind(简单,但缓慢且可能不准确,特别是在优化时)或 AddressSanitizer(需要重新构建,但非常快速和准确,除非在极端条件下)下运行您的代码,并且甚至可以使用优化) -
对数组大小的一个变化重复重新分配并不是特别好。一次分配尽可能多的空间可能会做得更好,或者跟踪分配的内容和正在使用的内容,仅在必要时分配更多空间。 Jon Bentley 1999 年的 Programming Pearls, 2nd Edn 和 1988 年的 More Programming Pearls 包含用于在您使用时处理基于数组的堆的代码。您可以在我的this answer 中找到该代码的概要。
-
大家好,我要感谢你们的帮助!非常感谢。通过采纳您的建议,我能够摆脱这些问题;在函数中重新分配,而是在
main()中创建更大的分配。事实证明,这更加稳定,该程序现在就像一个魅力。如果可以的话,我会投票:/
标签: c malloc realloc binary-heap