【发布时间】:2017-06-28 02:47:05
【问题描述】:
我有一些奖励数据。每个奖励或赠款都有一个赠款编号和金额以及实体的 ID。我按 ID 总结了奖励的计数和所有奖励的 $Amount。然后我根据范围检查返回一组总行或一个子集。
我怎样才能找出为什么所有子集的总和总是比总集小一?这是我的存储过程:
ALTER Procedure [dbo].[FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards]
/*
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 0
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 1
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 2
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 3
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 4
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 5
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 6
*/
-- populates #TempGrants according to range filter on TotalAmount
(
@Range int = 0
-- 0 = no filtering
-- 1 = < $1 million
-- 2 = < $5 million
-- 3 = < $10 million
-- 4 = < $15 million
-- 5 = < $20 million
-- 6 = > $20 million
)
As
-- if calling sproc did not create this table, create here to allow unit testing
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#TempGrants') IS NULL
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE #TempGrants
(
ID nchar(6) NOT NULL
, TotalAwards decimal (16, 0) NULL
, TotalAmount decimal (16, 0) NULL
)
END
-- step 1. Summarize grants creating colums for HAVING filter
CREATE TABLE #TempGrantsUnfiltered
(
ID nchar(6) NOT NULL
, TotalAwards decimal (16, 0) NULL
, TotalAmount decimal (16, 0) NULL
)
insert into #TempGrantsUnfiltered
(
ID
, TotalAwards
, TotalAmount
)
select o.id
,COUNT( o.GrantNumber) as TotalAwards
,SUM( o.TotalObligatedAmount) as TotalAmount
from dbo.FLAS2_Grants o
group BY O.ID
-- step 2. HAVING filter returns grant totals per range test
insert into #TempGrants
(
ID
, TotalAwards
, TotalAmount
)
select o.id
,TotalAwards
,TotalAmount
from #TempGrantsUnfiltered o
WHERE
CASE
When @Range = 0 Then 1
When @Range = 1 AND TotalAmount < 1000000 Then 1
When @Range = 2 AND TotalAmount BETWEEN 1000001 AND 5000000 Then 1
When @Range = 3 AND TotalAmount BETWEEN 5000001 AND 10000000 Then 1
When @Range = 4 AND TotalAmount BETWEEN 10000001 AND 15000000 Then 1
When @Range = 5 AND TotalAmount BETWEEN 15000001 AND 20000000 Then 1
When @Range = 6 AND TotalAmount > 20000000 Then 1
ELSE 0 -- where 0 = 1 rejects record
END = 1 -- where 1 = 1 allows record
order by TotalAmount desc
当我执行以下块时:
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 0
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 1
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 2
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 3
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 4
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 5
EXECUTE FLAS2_List_Awards_V3_PrepAwards 6
我在使用 SQL Management Studio 的消息窗口中得到以下结果:
(597 row(s) affected)
(597 row(s) affected)
(597 row(s) affected)
(65 row(s) affected)
(597 row(s) affected)
(341 row(s) affected)
(597 row(s) affected)
(89 row(s) affected)
(597 row(s) affected)
(39 row(s) affected)
(597 row(s) affected)
(23 row(s) affected)
(597 row(s) affected)
(39 row(s) affected)
我无法解释子集中缺少的行或总集中的额外行。有什么想法吗?
65 + 341 + 89 + 39 + 23 +39 = 596 < 597
【问题讨论】:
-
不应该将
TotalAmount < 1000000改为TotalAmount <= 1000000或TotalAmount < 1000001吗? -
我同意 SqlZim - 如果您有一个 TotalAmount = 1000000 的奖项,那么这不会被任何过滤器拾取,但它会被未过滤的总数拾取。
标签: sql-server sql-server-2008 tsql aggregate-functions where