您可以使用标准评估(group_by_ 而不是group_by)来做到这一点:
# Fake data
set.seed(492)
dat = data.frame(value=rnorm(1000), g1=sample(LETTERS,1000,replace=TRUE),
g2=sample(letters,1000,replace=TRUE), g3=sample(1:10, replace=TRUE),
other=sample(c("red","green","black"),1000,replace=TRUE))
dat %>% group_by_(.dots=names(dat)[-grep("value", names(dat))]) %>%
summarise(meanValue=mean(value))
g1 g2 g3 other meanValue
<fctr> <fctr> <int> <fctr> <dbl>
1 A a 2 green 0.89281475
2 A b 2 red -0.03558775
3 A b 5 black -1.79184218
4 A c 10 black 0.17518610
5 A e 5 black 0.25830392
...
请参阅this vignette,了解更多关于dplyr 中标准与非标准评估的信息。
dplyr0.7.0 的更新
解决@ÖmerAn 的评论:看起来group_by_at 是进入dplyr 0.7.0 的方式(如果我对此有误,请有人纠正我)。例如:
dat %>%
group_by_at(setdiff(names(dat), "value")) %>%
summarise(meanValue=mean(value))
# Groups: g1, g2, g3 [?]
g1 g2 g3 other meanValue
<fctr> <fctr> <int> <fctr> <dbl>
1 A a 2 green 0.89281475
2 A b 2 red -0.03558775
3 A b 5 black -1.79184218
4 A c 10 black 0.17518610
5 A e 5 black 0.25830392
6 A e 5 red -0.81879788
7 A e 7 green 0.30836054
8 A f 2 green 0.05537047
9 A g 1 black 1.00156405
10 A g 10 black 1.26884303
# ... with 949 more rows
让我们确认两种方法的输出相同(dplyr 0.7.0):
new = dat %>%
group_by_at(setdiff(names(dat), "value")) %>%
summarise(meanValue=mean(value))
old = dat %>%
group_by_(.dots=names(dat)[-grep("value", names(dat))]) %>%
summarise(meanValue=mean(value))
identical(old, new)
# [1] TRUE