【发布时间】:2012-10-10 19:53:01
【问题描述】:
我有这个内核
__global__ void kernel1(int keep, int include, int width, int* d_Xco,
int* d_Xnum, bool* d_Xvalid, float* d_Xblas)
{
int i, k;
i = threadIdx.x + blockIdx.x * blockDim.x;
if(i < keep){
for(k = 0; k < include ; k++){
int val = (d_Xblas[i*include + k] >= 1e5);
int aux = d_Xnum[i];
d_Xblas[i*include + k] *= (!val);
d_Xco[i*width + aux] = k;
d_Xnum[i] +=val;
d_Xvalid[i*include + k] = (!val);
}
}
}
发布于
int keep = 9000;
int include = 23000;
int width = 0.2*include;
int threads = 192;
int blocks = keep+threads-1/threads;
kernel1 <<< blocks,threads >>>( keep, include, width,
d_Xco, d_Xnum, d_Xvalid, d_Xblas );
这个kernel1 工作正常,但显然没有完全优化。我认为消除内部循环k 会很直接,但由于某种原因它不能正常工作。
我的第一个想法是:
__global__ void kernel2(int keep, int include, int width,
int* d_Xco, int* d_Xnum, bool* d_Xvalid,
float* d_Xblas)
{
int i, k;
i = threadIdx.x + blockIdx.x * blockDim.x;
k = threadIdx.y + blockIdx.y * blockDim.y;
if((i < keep) && (k < include) ) {
int val = (d_Xblas[i*include + k] >= 1e5);
int aux = d_Xnum[i];
d_Xblas[i*include + k] *= (float)(!val);
d_Xco[i*width + aux] = k;
atomicAdd(&d_Xnum[i], val);
d_Xvalid[i*include + k] = (!val);
}
}
以 2D 网格启动:
int keep = 9000;
int include = 23000;
int width = 0.2*include;
int th = 32;
dim3 threads(th,th);
dim3 blocks ((keep+threads.x-1)/threads.x, (include+threads.y-1)/threads.y);
kernel2 <<< blocks,threads >>>( keep, include, width, d_Xco, d_Xnum,
d_Xvalid, d_Xblas );
虽然我认为这个想法很好,但它不起作用,而且我的想法已经用完了。你能帮帮我吗?我还认为问题可能出在d_Xco 中,它将位置k 存储在一个较小的数组中并将它们推到数组的开头,因此顺序很重要。
d_Xco
-------------------------------
| 2|3 |15 |4 |5 |5 | | | | | | .......
-------------------------------
【问题讨论】:
-
网格应创建为
dim3 blocks((keep + threads.x -1)/threads.x,(include + threads.y - 1)/threads.y);。你忘记了括号。 -
@ sgar91 抱歉,打错了。更新
-
为什么kernel2不工作?它给出了错误的结果?它根本不执行?
-
@pQB 是的,错误的结果。它确实加快了速度,但是......执行很好,快速且流畅。
-
您的数据是如何排列的?根据 kernel2 你有
keep列和include行。