【发布时间】:2016-04-02 01:17:06
【问题描述】:
我正在做一些实验,我将 Cifar-10 数据集分成两半,这样每一半都包含五个随机类。我用bvlc_alexnet 架构训练了一半。因此,我将num_output 更改为5 并对网络进行了其他一些小调整。当我检查日志文件时,我发现损失增加到 80 左右,测试准确度为 0。
但是,当我将 num_output 更改为 10 时,训练似乎正常,即损失稳步减少,测试准确率约为 70%。
如何解释?
train_val.prototxt
name: "AlexNet"
layer {
name: "data"
type: "Data"
top: "data"
top: "label"
include {
phase: TRAIN
}
transform_param {
mirror: true
crop_size: 25
}
data_param {
source: "/home/apples/caffe/cifar/cifarA/cifar_A_train_lmdb"
batch_size: 256
backend: LMDB
}
}
layer {
name: "data"
type: "Data"
top: "data"
top: "label"
include {
phase: TEST
}
transform_param {
mirror: false
crop_size: 25
}
data_param {
source: "/home/apples/caffe/cifar/cifarA/cifar_A_val_lmdb"
batch_size: 100
backend: LMDB
}
}
layer {
name: "conv1"
type: "Convolution"
bottom: "data"
top: "conv1"
param {
lr_mult: 1
decay_mult: 1
}
param {
lr_mult: 2
decay_mult: 0
}
convolution_param {
num_output: 96
kernel_size: 11
stride: 2
weight_filler {
type: "gaussian"
std: 0.01
}
bias_filler {
type: "constant"
value: 0
}
}
}
layer {
name: "relu1"
type: "ReLU"
bottom: "conv1"
top: "conv1"
}
layer {
name: "norm1"
type: "LRN"
bottom: "conv1"
top: "norm1"
lrn_param {
local_size: 5
alpha: 0.0001
beta: 0.75
}
}
layer {
name: "pool1"
type: "Pooling"
bottom: "norm1"
top: "pool1"
pooling_param {
pool: MAX
kernel_size: 3
stride: 2
}
}
layer {
name: "conv2"
type: "Convolution"
bottom: "pool1"
top: "conv2"
param {
lr_mult: 1
decay_mult: 1
}
param {
lr_mult: 2
decay_mult: 0
}
convolution_param {
num_output: 256
pad: 2
kernel_size: 5
group: 2
weight_filler {
type: "gaussian"
std: 0.01
}
bias_filler {
type: "constant"
value: 0.1
}
}
}
layer {
name: "relu2"
type: "ReLU"
bottom: "conv2"
top: "conv2"
}
layer {
name: "norm2"
type: "LRN"
bottom: "conv2"
top: "norm2"
lrn_param {
local_size: 5
alpha: 0.0001
beta: 0.75
}
}
layer {
name: "pool2"
type: "Pooling"
bottom: "norm2"
top: "pool2"
pooling_param {
pool: MAX
kernel_size: 3
stride: 2
}
}
layer {
name: "conv3"
type: "Convolution"
bottom: "pool2"
top: "conv3"
param {
lr_mult: 1
decay_mult: 1
}
param {
lr_mult: 2
decay_mult: 0
}
convolution_param {
num_output: 384
pad: 1
kernel_size: 3
weight_filler {
type: "gaussian"
std: 0.01
}
bias_filler {
type: "constant"
value: 0
}
}
}
layer {
name: "relu3"
type: "ReLU"
bottom: "conv3"
top: "conv3"
}
layer {
name: "conv4"
type: "Convolution"
bottom: "conv3"
top: "conv4"
param {
lr_mult: 1
decay_mult: 1
}
param {
lr_mult: 2
decay_mult: 0
}
convolution_param {
num_output: 384
pad: 1
kernel_size: 3
group: 2
weight_filler {
type: "gaussian"
std: 0.01
}
bias_filler {
type: "constant"
value: 0.1
}
}
}
layer {
name: "relu4"
type: "ReLU"
bottom: "conv4"
top: "conv4"
}
layer {
name: "conv5"
type: "Convolution"
bottom: "conv4"
top: "conv5"
param {
lr_mult: 1
decay_mult: 1
}
param {
lr_mult: 2
decay_mult: 0
}
convolution_param {
num_output: 256
pad: 1
kernel_size: 3
group: 2
weight_filler {
type: "gaussian"
std: 0.01
}
bias_filler {
type: "constant"
value: 0.1
}
}
}
layer {
name: "relu5"
type: "ReLU"
bottom: "conv5"
top: "conv5"
}
layer {
name: "pool5"
type: "Pooling"
bottom: "conv5"
top: "pool5"
pooling_param {
pool: MAX
kernel_size: 3
stride: 2
}
}
layer {
name: "fc6"
type: "InnerProduct"
bottom: "pool5"
top: "fc6"
param {
lr_mult: 1
decay_mult: 1
}
param {
lr_mult: 2
decay_mult: 0
}
inner_product_param {
num_output: 4096
weight_filler {
type: "gaussian"
std: 0.005
}
bias_filler {
type: "constant"
value: 0.1
}
}
}
layer {
name: "relu6"
type: "ReLU"
bottom: "fc6"
top: "fc6"
}
layer {
name: "drop6"
type: "Dropout"
bottom: "fc6"
top: "fc6"
dropout_param {
dropout_ratio: 0.5
}
}
layer {
name: "fc7"
type: "InnerProduct"
bottom: "fc6"
top: "fc7"
param {
lr_mult: 1
decay_mult: 1
}
param {
lr_mult: 2
decay_mult: 0
}
inner_product_param {
num_output: 4096
weight_filler {
type: "gaussian"
std: 0.005
}
bias_filler {
type: "constant"
value: 0.1
}
}
}
layer {
name: "relu7"
type: "ReLU"
bottom: "fc7"
top: "fc7"
}
layer {
name: "drop7"
type: "Dropout"
bottom: "fc7"
top: "fc7"
dropout_param {
dropout_ratio: 0.5
}
}
layer {
name: "fc8_mnist"
type: "InnerProduct"
bottom: "fc7"
top: "fc8_mnist"
param {
lr_mult: 1
decay_mult: 1
}
param {
lr_mult: 2
decay_mult: 0
}
inner_product_param {
num_output: 5
weight_filler {
type: "gaussian"
std: 0.01
}
bias_filler {
type: "constant"
value: 0
}
}
}
layer {
name: "accuracy"
type: "Accuracy"
bottom: "fc8_mnist"
bottom: "label"
top: "accuracy"
include {
phase: TEST
}
}
layer {
name: "loss"
type: "SoftmaxWithLoss"
bottom: "fc8_mnist"
bottom: "label"
top: "loss"
}
此拆分包含 0、4、5、6 和 8 类。我使用 create_imagenet.sh 脚本创建了 lmdb 文件。
train.txt 示例
0/attack_aircraft_s_001759.png 0
0/propeller_plane_s_001689.png 0
4/fallow_deer_s_000021.png 4
4/alces_alces_s_000686.png 4
5/toy_spaniel_s_000327.png 5
5/toy_spaniel_s_000511.png 5
6/bufo_viridis_s_000502.png 6
6/bufo_viridis_s_001005.png 6
8/passenger_ship_s_000236.png 8
8/passenger_ship_s_000853.png 8
val.txt 示例
0/attack_aircraft_s_000002.png 0
0/propeller_plane_s_000006.png 0
4/fallow_deer_s_000001.png 4
4/alces_alces_s_000012.png 4
5/toy_spaniel_s_000020.png 5
6/bufo_viridis_s_000016.png 6
8/passenger_ship_s_000060.png 8
【问题讨论】:
-
根据您的描述不清楚,但我认为训练分区和验证分区包含相同的 10 个类中的 5 个,对吗?如果您的分区逻辑不好,并且您有来自训练中未看到的类的验证(测试)类样本,那么您会得到一个低测试错误。如果您在分区之间进行了分类划分,则测试错误将是 100%(0 准确度)。
-
感谢您的回复。正确,训练和验证包含相同的类。我唯一改变的是
num_output从 5 到 10。这可能是 Caffe 中的错误吗? -
如果你也使用训练测试作为测试图像集,准确率是多少。
-
对于标签5-9的分割,你是把标签改成0-4,还是保持标签不变?
-
@AnoopK.Prabhu 当我将训练数据用作测试数据时,Caffe 似乎在这一步冻结了
I0401 13:03:42.787312 24045 net.cpp:411] data -> label(我同时使用了num_output5 和 10。)
标签: machine-learning neural-network deep-learning caffe