当我需要生成代码时,我经常查看System.CodeDom 命名空间。它使您可以构建代码的逻辑表示,然后为您构建的内容获取相应的源代码。但是,我不知道我是否可以说这种方式并不像您在回答中所说的那样“麻烦”(这肯定涉及“剖析”MethodInfo。但是,它确实为您提供了相当不错的基础. 只需传入要“克隆”的接口、新类的名称和要扩展的基类,如下所示:
var code = GenerateCode(typeof(TestInterface<>),
"MyNewClass",
typeof(TestBaseClass<>));
将导致:
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// <auto-generated>
// This code was generated by a tool.
// Runtime Version:4.0.30319.237
//
// Changes to this file may cause incorrect behavior and will be lost if
// the code is regenerated.
// </auto-generated>
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
namespace MyNamespace {
using System;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
public class MyNewClass<TWheel> : TestInterface<TWheel>, TestBaseClass<TWheel>
{
public MyNamespace.ICar Drive<TCar>(Expression<Func<TWheel, bool>> wheels, int miles)
{
return base.Drive(wheels, miles);
}
}
}
此外,您可以更改代码中的一些字符并切换到 VB 提供程序,您将获得 Visual Basic 输出(可能没用但有点酷):
'------------------------------------------------------------------------------
' <auto-generated>
' This code was generated by a tool.
' Runtime Version:4.0.30319.237
'
' Changes to this file may cause incorrect behavior and will be lost if
' the code is regenerated.
' </auto-generated>
'------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Option Strict Off
Option Explicit On
Imports System
Imports System.Linq.Expressions
Namespace MyNamespace
Public Class MyNewClass(Of TWheel)
Inherits TestInterface(Of TWheel)
Implements TestBaseClass(Of TWheel)
Public Function Drive(Of TCar)(ByVal wheels As Expression(Of Func(Of TWheel, Boolean)), ByVal miles As Integer) As MyNamespace.ICar
Return MyBase.Drive(wheels, miles)
End Function
End Class
End Namespace
这是GenerateCode 野兽。希望 cmets 可以解释发生了什么:
public static string GenerateCode(Type interfaceType, string generatedClassName, Type baseClass)
{
//Sanity check
if (!interfaceType.IsInterface)
throw new ArgumentException("Interface expected");
//I can't think of a good way to handle closed generic types so I just won't support them
if (interfaceType.IsGenericType && !interfaceType.IsGenericTypeDefinition)
throw new ArgumentException("Closed generic type not expected.");
//Build the class
var newClass = new CodeTypeDeclaration(generatedClassName)
{
IsClass = true,
TypeAttributes = TypeAttributes.Public,
BaseTypes =
{
//Include the interface and provided class as base classes
MakeTypeReference(interfaceType),
MakeTypeReference(baseClass)
}
};
//Add type arguments (if the interface is generic)
if (interfaceType.IsGenericType)
foreach (var genericArgumentType in interfaceType.GetGenericArguments())
newClass.TypeParameters.Add(genericArgumentType.Name);
//Loop through each method
foreach (var mi in interfaceType.GetMethods())
{
//Create the method
var method = new CodeMemberMethod
{
Attributes = MemberAttributes.Public | MemberAttributes.Final,
Name = mi.Name,
ReturnType = MakeTypeReference(mi.ReturnType)
};
//Add any generic types
if (mi.IsGenericMethod)
foreach (var genericParameter in mi.GetGenericArguments())
method.TypeParameters.Add(genericParameter.Name);
//Add the parameters
foreach (var par in mi.GetParameters())
method.Parameters.Add(new CodeParameterDeclarationExpression(MakeTypeReference(par.ParameterType),
par.Name));
//Call the same method on the base passing all the parameters
var allParameters =
mi.GetParameters().Select(p => new CodeArgumentReferenceExpression(p.Name)).ToArray();
var callBase = new CodeMethodInvokeExpression(new CodeBaseReferenceExpression(), mi.Name, allParameters);
//If the method is void, we just call base
if (mi.ReturnType == typeof(void))
method.Statements.Add(callBase);
else
//Otherwise, we return the value from the call to base
method.Statements.Add(new CodeMethodReturnStatement(callBase));
//Add the method to our class
newClass.Members.Add(method);
}
//TODO: Also add properties if needed?
//Make a "CompileUnit" that has a namespace with some 'usings' and then
// our new class.
var unit = new CodeCompileUnit
{
Namespaces =
{
new CodeNamespace(interfaceType.Namespace)
{
Imports =
{
new CodeNamespaceImport("System"),
new CodeNamespaceImport("System.Linq.Expressions")
},
Types =
{
newClass
}
}
}
};
//Use the C# prvider to get a code generator and generate the code
//Switch this to VBCodeProvider to generate VB Code
var gen = new CSharpCodeProvider().CreateGenerator();
using (var tw = new StringWriter())
{
gen.GenerateCodeFromCompileUnit(unit, tw, new CodeGeneratorOptions());
return tw.ToString();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Helper method for expanding out a type with all it's generic types.
/// It seems like there should be an easier way to do this but this work.
/// </summary>
private static CodeTypeReference MakeTypeReference(Type interfaceType)
{
//If the Type isn't generic, just wrap is directly
if (!interfaceType.IsGenericType)
return new CodeTypeReference(interfaceType);
//Otherwise wrap it but also pass the generic arguments (recursively calling this method
// on all the type arguments.
return new CodeTypeReference(interfaceType.Name,
interfaceType.GetGenericArguments().Select(MakeTypeReference).ToArray());
}