【发布时间】:2015-08-06 04:07:15
【问题描述】:
使用range-v3 library(@EricNiebler),使得编写算法代码更加紧凑,例如下面是如何生成一堆随机数:
#include <range/v3/all.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
int main()
{
using namespace ranges;
auto const N = 10;
std::vector<int> v;
v.reserve(N);
v |= action::push_back(view::iota(0, N));
random_shuffle(v);
copy(v, ostream_iterator<>(std::cout, ","));
}
但是,我更愿意像这样使用假设的action::random_shuffle() 来扩展管道
v |= action::push_back(view::iota(0, N)) | action::random_shuffle();
这是我编写这样一个动作的尝试(不幸的是,编写新的 range-v3 代码比使用库要冗长一些)
#include <functional> // bind, placeholders::_1
namespace ranges
{
inline namespace v3
{
/// \addtogroup group-actions
/// @{
namespace action
{
struct random_shuffle_fn
{
private:
friend action_access;
static auto bind(random_shuffle_fn random_shuffle)
RANGES_DECLTYPE_AUTO_RETURN
(
std::bind(random_shuffle, std::placeholders::_1)
)
template<typename Gen>
static auto bind(random_shuffle_fn random_shuffle, Gen && rand)
RANGES_DECLTYPE_AUTO_RETURN
(
std::bind(random_shuffle, std::placeholders::_1, bind_forward<Gen>(rand))
)
public:
struct ConceptImpl
{
template<typename Rng,
typename I = range_iterator_t<Rng>>
auto requires_(Rng&&) -> decltype(
concepts::valid_expr(
concepts::model_of<concepts::RandomAccessRange, Rng>(),
concepts::is_true(Permutable<I>())
));
};
template<typename Rng>
using Concept = concepts::models<ConceptImpl, Rng>;
template<typename Rng,
CONCEPT_REQUIRES_(Concept<Rng>())>
Rng operator()(Rng && rng) const
{
ranges::random_shuffle(rng);
return std::forward<Rng>(rng);
}
template<typename Rng, typename Gen,
CONCEPT_REQUIRES_(Concept<Rng>())>
Rng operator()(Rng && rng, Gen && rand) const
{
ranges::random_shuffle(rng, std::forward<Gen>(rand));
return std::forward<Rng>(rng);
}
#ifndef RANGES_DOXYGEN_INVOKED
template<typename Rng>
void operator()(Rng &&) const
{
CONCEPT_ASSERT_MSG(RandomAccessRange<Rng>(),
"The object on which action::random_shuffle operates must be a model of the "
"RandomAccessRange concept.");
using I = range_iterator_t<Rng>;
CONCEPT_ASSERT_MSG(Permutable<I>(),
"The iterator type of the range passed to action::random_shuffle must allow its "
"elements to be permuted; that is, the values must be movable and the "
"iterator must be mutable.");
}
#endif
};
/// \ingroup group-actions
/// \relates sort_fn
/// \sa `action`
namespace
{
constexpr auto&& random_shuffle = static_const<action<random_shuffle_fn>>::value;
}
}
/// @}
}
}
Live Example 编译失败,因为一些operator() 深藏在某处找不到。
据我所知,我忠实地从类似代码中翻译了上述代码,例如action::sort()。唯一的区别是random_shuffle() 有两个重载(一个采用随机生成器),而所有其他操作(包括sort)都有一个重载,其额外参数(比较器、谓词、投影仪等)具有默认值.)。这转化为上面random_shuffle_fn 的两个bind() 静态成员函数,而所有其他操作只有一个bind() 重载。
问题:如何为 random_shuffle 编写 range-v3 动作?
【问题讨论】:
-
与问题不完全相关,但:
std::random_shuffle已弃用。使用std::shuffle。 -
-
@Casey 会不会把
iota打电话给reserve? -
好吧,如果
std::vector<int>{view::iota(0, N)}有效,我会这样做。抱歉,我一直在实现 range-v3-aware 容器,所以我已经习惯了这种语法;)
标签: c++ algorithm c++14 range-v3