【发布时间】:2014-05-16 15:55:15
【问题描述】:
我有以下模型定义
class Foo(Base):
__tablename__ = 'foo'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
name = Column(String(200))
class FooCycle(Base):
__tablename__ = 'foocycle'
foo_id = Column(
String(50),
ForeignKey('foo.id'),
primary_key=True
)
some_number = Column(
Integer,
primary_key=True,
)
foo = relationship("Foo", backref="cycles")
以及下面的测试用例
class HierarchicModelTest(unittest.TestCase):
def test_create_data_via_orm_save_twice(self):
# get_session is a convenience wrapper to access a scoped session object
s = get_session()
def create_foo():
foo = Foo(id="12345", name="fancy foo")
foo.cycles = [FooCycle(some_number=1)]
return foo
# initially create foo
foo = create_foo()
s.add(foo)
s.flush()
# recreating foo, using merge to update into database
foo = create_foo()
s.merge(foo)
# raises Exception: Dependency rule tried to blank-out primary key
# column 'foocycle.foo_id' on instance '<FooCycle at 0x32e6b10>'
s.flush()
测试失败,有一个整洁的小堆栈跟踪和最终断言错误,告诉我“依赖规则试图清除主键列 'foocycle.foo_id”。我假设 SQLAlchemy 不能或不想在 FooCycle 本身上计算 foo_id 的值。我可以自己在create_foo 中明确设置这个值:
def create_foo():
foo = Foo(id="12345", name="fancy foo")
foo.cycles = [FooCycle(some_number=1, foo_id="12345")]
return foo
但是,出于简洁、架构方面的考虑以及不可否认的个人自豪感,我不想这样做。有没有一种简单的方法可以让 SQLAlchemy 解决这个问题。我还没有完全理解依赖规则的目的。关于该问题的任何指示/信息?
堆栈跟踪:
# Test 1 of 7:
# test_core.HierarchicModelTest.test_create_data_via_orm_save_twice
===============
HierarchicModelTest: test_create_data_via_orm_save_twice (tests.test_core.HierarchicModelTest)
Failed test "test_create_data_via_orm_save_twice (tests.test_core.HierarchicModelTest)"! Reason: Dependency rule tried to blank-out primary key column 'foocycle.foo_id' on instance '<FooCycle at 0x39cda10>'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/backend/tests/test_core.py", line 115, in test_create_data_via_orm_save_twice
s.flush()
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/scoping.py", line 149, in do
return getattr(self.registry(), name)(*args, **kwargs)
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/session.py", line 1879, in flush
self._flush(objects)
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/session.py", line 1997, in _flush
transaction.rollback(_capture_exception=True)
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/util/langhelpers.py", line 57, in __exit__
compat.reraise(exc_type, exc_value, exc_tb)
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/session.py", line 1961, in _flush
flush_context.execute()
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/unitofwork.py", line 370, in execute
rec.execute(self)
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/unitofwork.py", line 479, in execute
self.dependency_processor.process_saves(uow, states)
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/dependency.py", line 552, in process_saves
uowcommit, False)
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/dependency.py", line 569, in _synchronize
sync.clear(dest, self.mapper, self.prop.synchronize_pairs)
File "/home/xxx/xxx/xxx/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/sync.py", line 53, in clear
(r, orm_util.state_str(dest))
AssertionError: Dependency rule tried to blank-out primary key column 'foocycle.foo_id' on instance '<FooCycle at 0x39cda10>'
【问题讨论】:
-
我不认为这是 SA 无法处理
foo_id的问题。事实上,这是 SA 确实能够做到这一点的一大优点。我相信问题是在mergeSA 期间删除FooCycle的第一个实例并插入新的实例。删除第一个是问题,因为它不会删除它的行,而只是尝试删除关系。所以你需要为你的关系配置正确的cascade规则。 -
感谢您的评论,为我指明了正确的方向。
-
@van 你能告诉我们在这种情况下 proper 级联规则是什么吗(最好作为答案,因为我猜这可能太多不适合评论)?你说它不会删除它的行,而只是尝试删除关系;但是如果行被删除,那么我们每次都会得到一个
FooCycle的新实例。有没有办法让 SA 更新现有的FooCycle行/实例? -
@PiotrDobrogost:SA 不会自动更新现有的行/实例。您应该编写代码首先搜索关系,然后将新实例中的数据合并到现有实例中。
-
我在 SQLAlchemy 新闻组 - Dependency rule tried to blank-out primary key column when trying to update using association proxy 上提出了类似的问题 - SQLAlchemy 的作者 Mike Bayer 对此进行了有趣的深入研究。
标签: python sqlalchemy