【发布时间】:2012-12-20 22:24:27
【问题描述】:
我观察到我的数据库非常奇怪的行为。 我有一张小表(大约 300 行),其中一个字段不断更新。
我在那里遇到了很多死锁 - 表的更新导致同一张表的类似更新死锁(U 锁与 X 锁)。
所以我决定删除聚集索引(所以表现在没有任何索引)来修复死锁。但它没有帮助,现在我在 U 和 X 锁定模式之间陷入僵局。
所以一张表,没有索引和 2 个会话更新一张表
受害者
update dbo.MyNumber set
@nextno = nextno = nextno + 1
where [type] = @type
and yearid = @yearid
获胜查询:
update dbo.MyNumber set
@nextno = nextno = nextno + 1
where [type] = @TYPE
and yrclosedyn = 0
行肯定不同,但页面相同。
这怎么可能?也许它与锁升级有关,或者......?
我非常感谢任何建议。
提前致谢 迈克
死锁 XML:
<deadlock-list>
<deadlock victim="process6c492e8">
<process-list>
<process id="processb6a988" taskpriority="0" logused="1848" waitresource="RID: 5:1:127478:16" waittime="3478" ownerId="17153439" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2012-12-18T12:31:40.147" XDES="0xffffffff89482258" lockMode="U" schedulerid="7" kpid="4248" status="suspended" spid="98" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" transcount="2" lastbatchstarted="2012-12-18T12:31:49.913" lastbatchcompleted="2012-12-18T12:31:49.913" clientapp="PenAIR" hostname="S16047425" hostpid="9300" loginname="sa" isolationlevel="read committed (2)" xactid="17153439" currentdb="5" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="673185824" clientoption2="128056">
<executionStack>
<frame procname="MYDATABASE.dbo.MyStoredProcedure" line="92" stmtstart="9062" stmtend="9388" sqlhandle="0x030005002d15a05e58b5710016a100000100000000000000">
UPDATE dbo.MyNumber Set
@NEXTNO = NEXTNO = NEXTNO + 1
WHERE (TYPE = @TYPE) AND (YRCLOSEDYN = 0) </frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf>
Proc [Database Id = 5 Object Id = 1587549485] </inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="process6c492e8" taskpriority="0" logused="192" waitresource="RID: 5:1:127478:20" waittime="8252" ownerId="17153562" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2012-12-18T12:31:45.140" XDES="0x6583b1e0" lockMode="U" schedulerid="13" kpid="19824" status="suspended" spid="143" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" transcount="2" lastbatchstarted="2012-12-18T12:31:45.140" lastbatchcompleted="2012-12-18T12:31:45.140" clientapp="PenAIR" hostname="S16047425" hostpid="4760" loginname="sa" isolationlevel="read committed (2)" xactid="17153562" currentdb="5" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="673185824" clientoption2="128056">
<executionStack>
<frame procname="MYDATABASE.dbo.MyStoredProcedure" line="92" stmtstart="9062" stmtend="9388" sqlhandle="0x030005002d15a05e58b5710016a100000100000000000000">
UPDATE dbo.MyNumber Set
@NEXTNO = NEXTNO = NEXTNO + 1
WHERE ([TYPE] = @TYPE) AND (YRCLOSEDYN = 0) </frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf>
Proc [Database Id = 5 Object Id = 1587549485] </inputbuf>
</process>
</process-list>
<resource-list>
<ridlock fileid="1" pageid="127478" dbid="5" objectname="MYDATABASE.dbo.MyNumber" id="lock464f2640" mode="X" associatedObjectId="72057594131120128">
<owner-list>
<owner id="processb6a988" mode="X"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process6c492e8" mode="U" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</ridlock>
<ridlock fileid="1" pageid="127478" dbid="5" objectname="MYDATABASE.dbo.MyNumber" id="lockfffffffff1974980" mode="X" associatedObjectId="72057594131120128">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process6c492e8" mode="X"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="processb6a988" mode="U" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</ridlock>
</resource-list>
</deadlock>
</deadlock-list>
【问题讨论】:
-
为什么你认为删除聚集索引会解决你的死锁?锁定发生在数据行上 - 无论您是否有聚集索引,都没有区别 ....
-
涉及的查询和死锁图有哪些?
-
已在帖子中添加,抱歉忘记查询
-
我删除了聚集索引,因为我希望数据库引擎使用另一种方式来获取表上的锁。当有聚集索引时,死锁发生在 HoBT 锁定级别。现在它看起来像是出现在页面级别。
-
表上有哪些索引?您是否有不同的 NCI 涵盖两个不同的
WHERE子句?两个不同的查询是否也可能更新同一行或一组重叠的行?你也有 XML 死锁图吗?
标签: sql-server-2008 locking deadlock database-deadlocks