【问题标题】:SQL re-execute stored procedure within try catch blockSQL 在 try catch 块中重新执行存储过程
【发布时间】:2012-02-08 16:11:55
【问题描述】:
我有一个正在执行 MERGE 的存储过程。考虑到流量,似乎两个请求同时调用 INSERT 而不是 UPDATE。由于外键约束,其中一个请求失败。如果我将合并语句放在 try catch 中并尝试重新执行存储过程,我假设这次它将运行 MERGE 的 UPDATE 部分并成功。对此的想法,它被认为是好的/坏的做法吗?
如果这很重要,我正在使用 SQL Server 2008。
提前喝彩
【问题讨论】:
标签:
sql
stored-procedures
merge
try-catch
【解决方案1】:
您可以在 try/catch 块中复制它,但更好的解决方案可能是解决并发运行时的锁定问题。在合并语句之前,实现类似这样的规范方法如下:
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
UPDATE dbo.Table WITH (HOLDLOCK)
SET Col = @Val
WHERE Key= @Something;
IF @@ROWCOUNT = 0
INSERT INTO dbo.TABLE (Key, Col) VALUES (@Key, @Val);
COMMIT TRANSACTION;
因此,对于 MERGE,我建议您执行以下操作:
MERGE dbo.Table WITH (HOLDLOCK) ...
我还建议使用 http://www.datamanipulation.net/sqlquerystress/ 测试并发性
【解决方案2】:
-- Verify that the stored procedure does not already exist.
IF OBJECT_ID ( 'usp_GetErrorInfo', 'P' ) IS NOT NULL
DROP PROCEDURE usp_GetErrorInfo;
GO
-- Create procedure to retrieve error information.
CREATE PROCEDURE usp_GetErrorInfo
AS
SELECT
ERROR_NUMBER() AS ErrorNumber
,ERROR_SEVERITY() AS ErrorSeverity
,ERROR_STATE() AS ErrorState
,ERROR_PROCEDURE() AS ErrorProcedure
,ERROR_LINE() AS ErrorLine
,ERROR_MESSAGE() AS ErrorMessage;
GO
BEGIN TRY
-- Generate divide-by-zero error.
SELECT 1/0;
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
-- Execute error retrieval routine.
EXECUTE usp_GetErrorInfo;
END CATCH;