【发布时间】:2017-07-16 10:54:12
【问题描述】:
我有一个关于 proguard 与 scala aws lambda 函数一起使用的问题。我创建了一个非常简单的 aws lambda 函数,如下所示:
package example
import scala.collection.JavaConverters._
import com.amazonaws.services.lambda.runtime.events.S3Event
import com.amazonaws.services.lambda.runtime.Context
object Main extends App {
def kinesisEventHandler(event: S3Event, context: Context): Unit = {
val result = event.getRecords.asScala.map(m => m.getS3.getObject.getKey)
println(result)
}
}
我已经导入了以下包:
"com.amazonaws" % "aws-lambda-java-core" % "1.1.0"
"com.amazonaws" % "aws-lambda-java-events" % "1.3.0"
当我创建一个胖 jar 时,它的大小为 13 MB,并且可以像预期的那样作为 AWS Lambda 函数工作(仅用于测试输出)。
13 MB 非常大,所以我尝试使用 proguard 来缩小 jar,但它不起作用,而且我总是遇到问题,两天后,我没有更多的想法如何解决这个问题。
这是我的 proguard 配置:
-injars "/Users/x/x/x/AWS_Lambda/target/scala-2.12/lambda-demo-assembly-1.0.jar"
-libraryjars "/Users/x/x/x/AWS_Lambda/lib_managed/jars/org.scala-lang/scala-library/scala-library-2.12.1.jar"
-libraryjars "/Users/x/x/x/AWS_Lambda/lib_managed/jars/com.amazonaws/aws-lambda-java-core/aws-lambda-java-core-1.1.0.jar"
-libraryjars "/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_102.jdk/Contents/Home/jre/lib/rt.jar"
-libraryjars "/Users/x/x/x/AWS_Lambda/lib_managed/jars/com.amazonaws/aws-java-sdk-s3/aws-java-sdk-s3-1.11.0.jar"
-libraryjars "/Users/x/x/x/AWS_Lambda/lib_managed/jars/com.amazonaws/aws-lambda-java-events/aws-lambda-java-events-1.3.0.jar"
-outjars "/Users/x/x/x/AWS_Lambda/target/scala-2.12/proguard/lambda-demo_2.12-1.0.jar"
-dontoptimize
-dontobfuscate
-dontnote
-dontwarn
-keepattributes SourceFile,LineNumberTable
# Preserve all annotations.
-keepattributes *Annotation*
# Preserve all public applications.
-keepclasseswithmembers public class * {
public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
}
# Preserve some classes and class members that are accessed by means of
# introspection.
-keep class * implements org.xml.sax.EntityResolver
-keepclassmembers class * {
** MODULE$;
}
-keepclassmembernames class scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool {
long eventCount;
int workerCounts;
int runControl;
scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WaitQueueNode syncStack;
scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WaitQueueNode spareStack;
}
-keepclassmembernames class scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinWorkerThread {
int base;
int sp;
int runState;
}
-keepclassmembernames class scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinTask {
int status;
}
-keepclassmembernames class scala.concurrent.forkjoin.LinkedTransferQueue {
scala.concurrent.forkjoin.LinkedTransferQueue$PaddedAtomicReference head;
scala.concurrent.forkjoin.LinkedTransferQueue$PaddedAtomicReference tail;
scala.concurrent.forkjoin.LinkedTransferQueue$PaddedAtomicReference cleanMe;
}
# Preserve some classes and class members that are accessed by means of
# introspection in the Scala compiler library, if it is processed as well.
#-keep class * implements jline.Completor
#-keep class * implements jline.Terminal
#-keep class scala.tools.nsc.Global
#-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
# <init>(scala.tools.nsc.Global);
#}
#-keepclassmembers class * {
# *** scala_repl_value();
# *** scala_repl_result();
#}
# Preserve all native method names and the names of their classes.
-keepclasseswithmembernames,includedescriptorclasses class * {
native <methods>;
}
# Preserve the special static methods that are required in all enumeration
# classes.
-keepclassmembers,allowoptimization enum * {
public static **[] values();
public static ** valueOf(java.lang.String);
}
# Explicitly preserve all serialization members. The Serializable interface
# is only a marker interface, so it wouldn't save them.
# You can comment this out if your application doesn't use serialization.
# If your code contains serializable classes that have to be backward
# compatible, please refer to the manual.
-keepclassmembers class * implements java.io.Serializable {
static final long serialVersionUID;
static final java.io.ObjectStreamField[] serialPersistentFields;
private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream);
private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream);
java.lang.Object writeReplace();
java.lang.Object readResolve();
}
# Your application may contain more items that need to be preserved;
# typically classes that are dynamically created using Class.forName:
# -keep public class mypackage.MyClass
# -keep public interface mypackage.MyInterface
# -keep public class * implements mypackage.MyInterface
-keep,includedescriptorclasses class example.** { *; }
-keepclassmembers class * {
<init>(...);
}
当我运行它时,我的 jar 非常小(大约 5 MB),但是当我启动 lambda 时,我收到以下错误
"errorMessage": "java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: com.amazonaws.services.s3.event.S3EventNotification.parseJson(java.lang.String)",
"errorType": "lambdainternal.util.ReflectUtil$ReflectException"
我看了一下类,proguard 删除了这个函数。当我更改配置以保留此文件时,我在另一个文件中遇到了另一个问题。
是否有人已经使用带有 scala AWS lambda 函数的 proguard 并且具有良好的设置或知道这个问题?有没有其他好的办法来缩小罐子的大小?
最好, 锂
【问题讨论】:
-
这里定义了限制docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/limits.html#limits-list 他们非常慷慨,但是对于大型档案,您必须上传到 S3 并在您的 lambda 控制台中指向 S3 位置。我已经上传了最大 75MB 的 scala zip 文件。
标签: scala amazon-web-services proguard