【发布时间】:2016-02-16 10:56:55
【问题描述】:
我最近一直在学习 LMAX Disruptor 并进行了一些实验。令我困惑的一件事是EventHandler 的onEvent 处理程序方法的endOfBatch 参数。考虑我的以下代码。首先,我称之为Test1 和Test1Worker 的虚拟消息和消费者类:
public class Test1 {
}
public class Test1Worker implements EventHandler<Test1>{
public void onEvent(Test1 event, long sequence, boolean endOfBatch) {
try{
Thread.sleep(500);
}
catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println("Received message with sequence " + sequence + ". "
+ "EndOfBatch = " + endOfBatch);
}
}
请注意,我设置了 500 毫秒的延迟,以替代一些现实世界的工作。我还在控制台中打印
的序列号然后我的驱动程序类(充当生产者)称为DisruptorTest:
public class DisruptorTest {
private static Disruptor<Test1> bus1;
private static ExecutorService test1Workers;
public static void main(String[] args){
test1Workers = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(1);
bus1 = new Disruptor<Test1>(new Test1Factory(), 8, test1Workers);
bus1.handleEventsWith(new Test1Worker());
RingBuffer<Test1> buf1 = bus1.start();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++){
long a = System.currentTimeMillis();
long next = buf1.next();
long b = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("Delay for claiming slot " + i + " is "+ (b - a));
try {
Test1 message = buf1.get(next);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
buf1.publish(next);
}
}
}
public static class Test1Factory implements EventFactory<Test1> {
public Test1 newInstance() {
return new Test1();
}
}
}
在这里,在初始化所需的东西之后,我向RingBuffer(缓冲区大小 8)提供了 10 条消息,并尝试监视一些事情 - 生产者在 RingBuffer 中声明下一个插槽的延迟以及消息及其在消费者端的序列号,以及特定序列是否被视为批处理结束。
现在,有趣的是,处理每条消息涉及 500 毫秒的延迟,这就是我得到的输出:
Delay for claiming slot 0 is 0
Delay for claiming slot 1 is 0
Delay for claiming slot 2 is 0
Delay for claiming slot 3 is 0
Delay for claiming slot 4 is 0
Delay for claiming slot 5 is 0
Delay for claiming slot 6 is 0
Delay for claiming slot 7 is 0
Received message with sequence 0. EndOfBatch = true
Delay for claiming slot 8 is 505
Received message with sequence 1. EndOfBatch = false
Received message with sequence 2. EndOfBatch = false
Received message with sequence 3. EndOfBatch = false
Received message with sequence 4. EndOfBatch = false
Received message with sequence 5. EndOfBatch = false
Received message with sequence 6. EndOfBatch = false
Received message with sequence 7. EndOfBatch = true
Delay for claiming slot 9 is 3519
Received message with sequence 8. EndOfBatch = true
Received message with sequence 9. EndOfBatch = true
但是,如果我去掉 500 毫秒的等待时间,我会得到:
Delay for claiming slot 0 is 0
Delay for claiming slot 1 is 0
Received message with sequence 0. EndOfBatch = true
Received message with sequence 1. EndOfBatch = true
Delay for claiming slot 2 is 0
Received message with sequence 2. EndOfBatch = true
Delay for claiming slot 3 is 0
Received message with sequence 3. EndOfBatch = true
Delay for claiming slot 4 is 0
Received message with sequence 4. EndOfBatch = true
Delay for claiming slot 5 is 0
Received message with sequence 5. EndOfBatch = true
Delay for claiming slot 6 is 0
Received message with sequence 6. EndOfBatch = true
Delay for claiming slot 7 is 0
Received message with sequence 7. EndOfBatch = true
Delay for claiming slot 8 is 1
Delay for claiming slot 9 is 0
Received message with sequence 8. EndOfBatch = false
Received message with sequence 9. EndOfBatch = true
所以看起来某条消息是否被认为是在批处理的末尾(即批处理的大小)受到消费者消息处理延迟的影响。可能我在这里很愚蠢,但这应该是这样吗?这背后的原因是什么?无论如何,什么决定了批量大小?提前致谢。如果我的问题中有任何不清楚的地方,请告诉我。
【问题讨论】:
-
如果你想了解更多细节,你可能应该看看 Aleksey Shipilev 的一些关于 JVM 基准测试的视频 - shipilev.net
标签: java multithreading producer-consumer disruptor-pattern lmax