【发布时间】:2016-09-07 11:03:58
【问题描述】:
我有一个任务:从每组(按时间)数据中获取第一、最后、最大值、最小值。我的解决方案有效,但速度极慢,因为表中的行数约为 5000 万。
如何提高此查询的性能:
SELECT
date_trunc('minute', t_ordered."timestamp"),
MIN (t_ordered.price),
MAX (t_ordered.price),
FIRST (t_ordered.price),
LAST (t_ordered.price)
FROM(
SELECT t.price, t."timestamp"
FROM trade t
WHERE t."timestamp" >= '2016-01-01' AND t."timestamp" < '2016-09-01'
ORDER BY t."timestamp" ASC
) t_ordered
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY 1
FIRST 和 LAST 是聚合函数from postgresql wiki
已编入索引的时间戳列。 解释(分析,详细):
GroupAggregate (cost=13112830.84..33300949.59 rows=351556 width=14) (actual time=229538.092..468212.450 rows=351138 loops=1)
Output: (date_trunc('minute'::text, t_ordered."timestamp")), min(t_ordered.price), max(t_ordered.price), first(t_ordered.price), last(t_ordered.price)
Group Key: (date_trunc('minute'::text, t_ordered."timestamp"))
-> Sort (cost=13112830.84..13211770.66 rows=39575930 width=14) (actual time=229515.281..242472.677 rows=38721704 loops=1)
Output: (date_trunc('minute'::text, t_ordered."timestamp")), t_ordered.price
Sort Key: (date_trunc('minute'::text, t_ordered."timestamp"))
Sort Method: external sort Disk: 932656kB
-> Subquery Scan on t_ordered (cost=6848734.55..7442373.50 rows=39575930 width=14) (actual time=102166.368..155540.492 rows=38721704 loops=1)
Output: date_trunc('minute'::text, t_ordered."timestamp"), t_ordered.price
-> Sort (cost=6848734.55..6947674.38 rows=39575930 width=14) (actual time=102165.836..130971.804 rows=38721704 loops=1)
Output: t.price, t."timestamp"
Sort Key: t."timestamp"
Sort Method: external merge Disk: 993480kB
-> Seq Scan on public.trade t (cost=0.00..1178277.21 rows=39575930 width=14) (actual time=0.055..25726.038 rows=38721704 loops=1)
Output: t.price, t."timestamp"
Filter: ((t."timestamp" >= '2016-01-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (t."timestamp" < '2016-09-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
Rows Removed by Filter: 9666450
Planning time: 1.663 ms
Execution time: 468949.753 ms
也许可以通过窗口函数来完成?我已经尝试过,但我没有足够的知识来使用它们
【问题讨论】:
-
内部查询的性能和行数是多少?
-
如果去掉子查询中的
first()、last()和order by,性能如何? -
子查询查询的行数约为600万
-
我需要在子查询中排序,没有它整个查询松散的感觉
-
只是想知道,时间戳列是否被索引?
标签: sql postgresql aggregate postgresql-performance