与数据库触发器相比，Hibernate 的拦截器效率如何？

Question

由于I can't make MySQL to update a column with ON UPDATE，我正在考虑使用Hibernate's interceptors，在每次更新行时更新updated 表。

我唯一担心的是，与让 MySQL 更新它的理想情况相比，它意味着多少性能损失？

Answer 1

没有显着的性能损失，您也不需要拦截器。

我为此创建了一个example on GitHub。

你需要创建一个 JPA 回调监听器：

public class UpdatableListener {

    @PrePersist
    @PreUpdate
    private void setCurrentTimestamp(Object entity) {
        if(entity instanceof Updatable) {
            Updatable updatable = (Updatable) entity;
            updatable.setTimestamp(new Date());
        }
    }

}

它使用这样定义的接口：

public interface Updatable {

    void setTimestamp(Date timestamp);

    Date getTimestamp();
}

然后您可以为所有实体定义一个基类：

@MappedSuperclass
@EntityListeners(UpdatableListener.class)
public class BaseEntity implements Updatable {

    @Column(name = "update_timestamp")
    private Date timestamp;

    @Override
    public void setTimestamp(Date timestamp) {
        this.timestamp = timestamp;
    }

    @Override
    public Date getTimestamp() {
        return timestamp;
    }
}

然后简单地让你的实体扩展它：

@Entity(name = "Post")
@Table(name = "post")
public class Post extends BaseEntity {
    ...  
}

@Entity(name = "PostComment")
@Table(name = "post_comment")
public static class PostComment extends BaseEntity {
    ...  
}

当您修改这些实体时：

doInJPA(entityManager -> {
    Post post = entityManager.find(Post.class, 1L);
    post.setTitle("Post");
    for(PostComment comment : post.getComments()) {
        comment.setReview("Review");
    }
});

Hibernate 将负责设置timestamp 列：

UPDATE  post
SET     update_timestamp = '2016-02-06 17:03:26.759' ,
        title = 'Post'
WHERE   id = 1
UPDATE  post_comment
SET     update_timestamp = '2016-02-06 17:03:26.76' ,
        post_id = 1 ,
        review = 'Review'
WHERE   id = 1
UPDATE  post_comment
SET     update_timestamp = '2016-02-06 17:03:26.76' ,
        post_id = 1 ,
        review = 'Review'
WHERE   id = 2