【发布时间】:2014-11-28 00:48:54
【问题描述】:
能否解释一下为什么在@ManyToOne 关系上设置@Filter 不起作用? 这里我有一个非常简单的例子来说明这一点:
我在我的数据库中创建了两个简单的表(foo 和 bar)
Foo: id/id_bar
bar: id/name/state (state can be active or inactive)
和我的实体:
@Entity
@FilterDef(name = "foo_active")
@Table(name = "foo")
public class Foo extends AbstractTimestampEntity implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@Column(name = "id")
private Integer id;
@ManyToOne(cascade = CascadeType.DETACH, fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
@JoinColumn(name = "bar")
@Filter(name = "foo_active", condition = "state='active'")
private Bar bar;
}
@Entity
@Table(name = "foo")
public class Bar extends AbstractTimestampEntity implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@Column(name = "id")
private Integer id;
@Column(name = "name")
private String name;
@Column(name = "state")
private String state;
}
现在当我运行这个查询时
@Query("SELECT f FROM Foo f")
public List<Foo> getTest();
它返回 Foo 的全部内容(活动和非活动......)它看起来过滤器没有被激活,即使我在查询之前运行很艰难
Session session = entityManager.unwrap(Session.class);
session.enableFilter("foo_active")
在日志中我可以看到:
0:47:33.878 [Test worker] DEBUG o.h.h.i.ast.QueryTranslatorImpl - HQL: SELECT f FROM pl.jcommerce.ocean.services.model.Foo f
00:47:33.878 [Test worker] DEBUG o.h.h.i.ast.QueryTranslatorImpl - S**QL: select foo0_.id as id1_5_, foo0_.created as created2_5_, foo0_.updated as updated3_5_, foo0_.bar as bar6_5_ from foo foo0_**
如你所见,有“WHERE bar.state='active'”子句....
有人可以帮我解决这个问题吗?
谢谢!
【问题讨论】:
标签: hibernate jpa filter many-to-one