区别：MobX 和 Redux [关闭]答案

【问题标题】：Difference between: MobX and Redux [closed]区别：MobX 和 Redux [关闭]
【发布时间】：2018-10-02 03:53:20
【问题描述】：

有什么区别？
在 React 或 React-Native 中，MobX 和 Redux 之间有什么更好的库，直到从小到大的大型项目？

【问题讨论】：

单存储 vs 多存储纯数据 vs 可观察数据可变 vs 不可变
我对这个问题的回答 (stackoverflow.com/a/51813683/741657) 可能会帮助您更好地理解。（也阅读问题，了解上下文）

【解决方案1】：

Redux
•	Large community, so lots of resources available online
•	Conceptually simple, clean abstractions
•	Matured dev tools
•	functional programming oriented, which offers cool benefits like time travelling, trivial action testing and such
•	Actions and state changes are very traceable
•	Rigid paradigm to work in (which is generally speaking a good thing)
MobX
•	Very efficient out of the box (applies side-ways-loading without needing selectors etc)
•	Very suitable for a state tree that has lot of inter data relationships; the data doesn't need to be normalized to a tree
•	More OO oriented; you can use classes, instance methods etc..; less new concepts to learn
•	UI is always kept up to date
•	no flux like action dispatching required (although you could still do that). On large apps this saves tremendous amounts of boilerplate
•	actions are really straightforward; you don't have to return new data structures etc. You can just alter objects and the changes are picked up automatically
•	Functional reactive programming oriented
•	Simpler to work with async actions

Redux

Mobx

【讨论】：

答案列出了其他人的答案，没有署名。代码 sn-p 不是格式化常规文本的正确方法。图片的格式应为图片，而不是链接，最好带有它们来自的链接。

【解决方案2】：

它们之间的主要区别在于，Redux 中有很多样板代码，而 Mobx 可以帮您省去这些代码（在内部，它会以尽可能最佳和最优的方式为您完成）。与 MobX 相比，Redux 在定义数据流时为您提供了很大的灵活性。

【讨论】：