【问题标题】:Naming both associations has_many/belongs_to in rails fails在 rails 中命名两个关联 has_many/belongs_to 失败
【发布时间】:2016-02-13 11:29:46
【问题描述】:

我确信这是一个简单的问题,但我不知道为什么它不起作用。我有两个模型RecipeInstructionInstructionImage。他们有一个 1:n 的关系,我希望他们的关联被命名为 imagesinstruction。我的模型:

class RecipeInstruction < ActiveRecord::Base
    belongs_to :recipe
    has_many :images, class_name: 'InstructionImage', autosave: true, inverse_of: :instruction
    accepts_nested_attributes_for :images
end

class InstructionImage < ActiveRecord::Base
    belongs_to :chef
    belongs_to :instruction, class_name: 'RecipeInstruction', inverse_of: :images, foreign_key: :instruction_id
    mount_uploader :file, PictureUploader

    validates :chef_id, presence: true
    validates :file, presence: true
    validates :instruction_id, presence: true
end

但是下面的代码失败了:

instruction = RecipeInstruction.new({"id"=>"", "text"=>"", "position"=>"0", "images_attributes"=>{"0"=>{"file"=>'test.png'}}})
expect(instruction).to be_an_instance_of(RecipeInstruction)

Failure/Error: instruction = RecipeInstruction.new({"id"=>"", "text"=>"", "position"=>"0", "images_attributes"=>{"0"=>{"file"=>'test.png'}}})

NoMethodError:
undefined method `val' for "?":Arel::Nodes::BindParam
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/relation.rb:574:in `block (2 levels) in where_values_hash'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/relation.rb:570:in `fetch'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/relation.rb:570:in `block in where_values_hash'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/relation.rb:563:in `map'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/relation.rb:563:in `where_values_hash'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/relation.rb:581:in `scope_for_create'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/associations/collection_association.rb:483:in `create_scope'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/associations/association.rb:168:in `initialize_attributes'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/associations/association.rb:248:in `block in build_record'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/core.rb:274:in `initialize'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/inheritance.rb:61:in `new'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/inheritance.rb:61:in `new'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/reflection.rb:130:in `build_association'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/associations/association.rb:247:in `build_record'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/associations/collection_association.rb:130:in `build'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/nested_attributes.rb:465:in `block in assign_nested_attributes_for_collection_association'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/nested_attributes.rb:460:in `each'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/nested_attributes.rb:460:in `assign_nested_attributes_for_collection_association'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/nested_attributes.rb:343:in `images_attributes='
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/attribute_assignment.rb:54:in `public_send'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/attribute_assignment.rb:54:in `_assign_attribute'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/attribute_assignment.rb:65:in `block in assign_nested_parameter_attributes'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/attribute_assignment.rb:65:in `each'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/attribute_assignment.rb:65:in `assign_nested_parameter_attributes'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/attribute_assignment.rb:45:in `assign_attributes'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/core.rb:551:in `init_attributes'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/core.rb:272:in `initialize'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/inheritance.rb:61:in `new'
/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/inheritance.rb:61:in `new'
./spec/recipe_instruction_spec.rb:9:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

我找到了未定义 foreign_key 列的解决方案,但我做了。我在/Users/alias/.rvm/src/rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.6/gems/activerecord-4.2.0.beta2/lib/active_record/relation.rb中调试了这个

def where_values_hash(relation_table_name = table_name)
  equalities = where_values.grep(Arel::Nodes::Equality).find_all { |node|
    node.left.relation.name == relation_table_name
  }

  binds = Hash[bind_values.find_all(&:first).map { |column, v| [column.name, v] }]

  Hash[equalities.map { |where|
    name = where.left.name
    puts 'debug'
    puts @klass.inspect
    puts @table.inspect
    puts name.inspect
    puts where.inspect
    [name, binds.fetch(name.to_s) {
      case where.right
      when Array then where.right.map(&:val)
      else
        where.right.val
      end
    }]
  }]
end

这里是调试:

InstructionImage(id: integer, file: string, chef_id: integer, instruction_id: integer, created_at: datetime, updated_at: datetime)

#<Arel::Table:0x007f9ec4a9d688 @name="instruction_images", @engine=InstructionImage(id: integer, file: string, chef_id: integer, instruction_id: integer, created_at: datetime, updated_at: datetime), @columns=nil, @aliases=[], @table_alias=nil, @primary_key=nil>

"recipe_instruction_id"

#<Arel::Nodes::Equality:0x007f9ec4a155a8 @left=#<struct Arel::Attributes::Attribute relation=#<Arel::Table:0x007f9ec4a15f30 @name="instruction_images", @engine=ActiveRecord::Base, @columns=nil, @aliases=[], @table_alias=nil, @primary_key=nil>, name="recipe_instruction_id">, @right="?">

为什么叫recipe_instruction_id。关系名称是instruction,我将它的外键定义为instruction_id。这是错误吗?我该如何解决?

谢谢

【问题讨论】:

    标签: ruby-on-rails activerecord foreign-keys has-many belongs-to


    【解决方案1】:

    您应该在 RecipeInstruction 类中定义 foreign_id。

    class RecipeInstruction < ActiveRecord::Base
      belongs_to :recipe
      has_many :images, class_name: 'InstructionImage', autosave: true, foreign_key: "instruction_id"
      accepts_nested_attributes_for :images
    end
    

    【讨论】:

    • 非常感谢,成功了!但是为什么不使用 `inverse_of: :instruction 这个技巧呢?你为我节省了很多时间,但我想不明白。
    猜你喜欢
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 1970-01-01
    • 2015-04-17
    • 2015-09-11
    • 1970-01-01
    相关资源
    最近更新 更多