更新:如 cmets 所述,此方法无法在 2.8 上编译,虽然 implicitly[Foo => Baz] 可以正常工作,但 (new Foo).lol 不能。
如果您将 transitive 重命名为 conforms 以隐藏 Predef 中的方法,则此方法效果很好:
implicit def conforms[A, B, C](implicit f: A => B, g: B => C): A => C = f andThen g
更多详情请见this answer。
附带说明:以-Xlog-implicits 启动REPL 是在这种情况下获取更多信息错误消息的便捷方式。在这种情况下,一开始并没有多大帮助:
scala> implicitly[Foo => Baz]
scala.this.Predef.conforms is not a valid implicit value for Foo => Baz because:
type mismatch;
found : <:<[Foo,Foo]
required: Foo => Baz
<console>:14: error: diverging implicit expansion for type Foo => Baz
starting with method transitive in object $iw
implicitly[Foo => Baz]
^
scala.this.Predef.conforms is not a valid implicit value for Foo => Baz because:
type mismatch;
found : <:<[Foo,Foo]
required: Foo => Baz
transitive is not a valid implicit value for Unit => Foo => Baz because:
not enough arguments for method transitive: (implicit f: A => B, implicit g: B => C)A => C.
Unspecified value parameter g.
transitive is not a valid implicit value for => Unit => Foo => Baz because:
not enough arguments for method transitive: (implicit f: A => B, implicit g: B => C)A => C.
Unspecified value parameter g.
但如果我们暂时将 foo2Bar 和 bar2Baz 重写为函数,我们会收到一条错误消息,突出显示歧义:
implicit val foo2Bar = (_: Foo) => new Bar
implicit val bar2Baz = (_: Bar) => new Baz
scala> implicitly[Foo => Baz]
transitive is not a valid implicit value for Foo => Baz because:
ambiguous implicit values:
both method conforms in object Predef of type [A]=> <:<[A,A]
and value foo2Bar in object $iw of type => Foo => Bar
match expected type Foo => B
现在很明显,我们只需要隐藏conforms。