【问题标题】:Group table in R by ID and sequence without gaps按ID和序列对R中的表进行分组,没有间隙
【发布时间】:2014-01-16 16:42:16
【问题描述】:

我有一张虚构的医院数据表,需要将出院日期替换为(不存在的)人员进行医院转院时的最终出院日期。

rows <- sort(c(which(data$TRANSFER_NUM != 0), which(data$TRANSFER_NUM == 1)-1))
subset <- data[rows,]

令人讨厌的是,有些人可以为不同的事件进行多次转移,即

ID DISCHARGE_DATE FILE_SEQUENCE TRANSFER_NUM 1992-12-04 3360 0 1993-02-11 3361 1 1993-03-10 3362 2 1993-11-25 3363 3 乙 1987-05-15 3419 0 乙 1987-05-19 3420 1 B 1990-02-03 3473 0 B 1990-02-05 3474 1

这意味着

ddply(subset, "ID", mutate, max=max(DISCHARGE_DATE))

会给 B 带来错误的结果,而正确的结果应该是:

ID DISCHARGE_DATE FILE_SEQUENCE TRANSFER_NUM NEW_DISCHARGE_DATE 1992-12-04 3360 0 1993-11-25 1993-02-11 3361 1 1993-11-25 1993-03-10 3362 2 1993-11-25 1993-11-25 3363 3 1993-11-25 B 1987-05-15 3419 0 1987-05-19 B 1987-05-19 3420 1 1987-05-19 B 1990-02-03 3473 0 1990-02-05 B 1990-02-05 3474 1 1990-02-05

我想一些额外的分组可能会有所帮助,也许是这样的:

ID DISCHARGE_DATE FILE_SEQUENCE TRANSFER_NUM GROUP NEW_DISCHARGE_DATE A 1992-12-04 3360 0 1 1993-11-25 1993-02-11 3361 1 1 1993-11-25 1993-03-10 3362 2 1 1993-11-25 A 1993-11-25 3363 3 1 1993-11-25 B 1987-05-15 3419 0 1 1987-05-19 B 1987-05-19 3420 1 1 1987-05-19 B 1990-02-03 3473 0 2 1990-02-05 B 1990-02-05 3474 1 2 1990-02-05

任何帮助将不胜感激!

【问题讨论】:

  • 温馨提示:datasubset 是常用的 R 命令。您可能会考虑不将它们用作对象名称。

标签: r plyr


【解决方案1】:

你是对的,你需要一个中间分组列。这是嵌套的ddply

ddply(
  ddply(df, "ID", mutate, GROUP=cumsum(c(0, diff(TRANSFER_NUM) < 0))),
  c("ID", "GROUP"),
  mutate, DISCHARGE_NEW=max(as.character(DISCHARGE_DATE))
)
#   ID DISCHARGE_DATE FILE_SEQUENCE TRANSFER_NUM GROUP DISCHARGE_NEW
# 1  A     1992-12-04          3360            0     0    1993-11-25
# 2  A     1993-02-11          3361            1     0    1993-11-25
# 3  A     1993-03-10          3362            2     0    1993-11-25
# 4  A     1993-11-25          3363            3     0    1993-11-25
# 5  B     1987-05-15          3419            0     0    1987-05-19
# 6  B     1987-05-19          3420            1     0    1987-05-19
# 7  B     1990-02-03          3473            0     1    1990-02-05
# 8  B     1990-02-05          3474            1     1    1990-02-05

【讨论】:

  • 这太棒了,非常感谢!我不认为我会想到 cumsum(c(0, diff(TRANSFER_NUM) &lt; 0)) 位。
  • @JoanneDemmler,我正在处理您发布的表格,按原样排序。这需要按 transfer_num 排序(至少在组内)才能工作。您确定您使用的df 与您发布的顺序相同吗?
【解决方案2】:

尝试:

ddply(subset, .(ID,grp=c(0,cumsum(diff(subset$TRANSFER_NUM)-1))), mutate, max=max(DISCHARGE_DATE))

它确实假设 TRANSFER_NUM 是连续的,即 1:x

根据评论,这是我得到的结果:

subset<-read.table(text="ID     DISCHARGE_DATE   FILE_SEQUENCE   TRANSFER_NUM
A      1992-12-04       3360            0
A      1993-02-11       3361            1
A      1993-03-10       3362            2
A      1993-11-25       3363            3
B      1987-05-15       3419            0
B      1987-05-19       3420            1
B      1990-02-03       3473            0
B      1990-02-05       3474            1",header=T)

subset$DISCHARGE_DATE<-as.Date(subset$DISCHARGE_DATE)

ddply(subset, .(ID,grp=c(0,cumsum(diff(subset$TRANSFER_NUM)-1))), mutate, max=max(DISCHARGE_DATE))

  grp ID DISCHARGE_DATE FILE_SEQUENCE TRANSFER_NUM        max
1   0  A     1992-12-04          3360            0 1993-11-25
2   0  A     1993-02-11          3361            1 1993-11-25
3   0  A     1993-03-10          3362            2 1993-11-25
4   0  A     1993-11-25          3363            3 1993-11-25
5  -6  B     1990-02-03          3473            0 1990-02-05
6  -6  B     1990-02-05          3474            1 1990-02-05
7  -4  B     1987-05-15          3419            0 1987-05-19
8  -4  B     1987-05-19          3420            1 1987-05-19

如果grp per ID的子顺序有问题,那么只需更改grp定义前面的符号即可:

ddply(subset, .(ID,grp=-c(0,cumsum(diff(subset$TRANSFER_NUM)-1))), mutate, max=max(DISCHARGE_DATE))

  grp ID DISCHARGE_DATE FILE_SEQUENCE TRANSFER_NUM        max
1   0  A     1992-12-04          3360            0 1993-11-25
2   0  A     1993-02-11          3361            1 1993-11-25
3   0  A     1993-03-10          3362            2 1993-11-25
4   0  A     1993-11-25          3363            3 1993-11-25
5   4  B     1987-05-15          3419            0 1987-05-19
6   4  B     1987-05-19          3420            1 1987-05-19
7   6  B     1990-02-03          3473            0 1990-02-05
8   6  B     1990-02-05          3474            1 1990-02-05

【讨论】:

  • 上面的一个非常简洁的版本。谢谢!
  • 嗨@JoanneDemmler - 我已经用我的结果更新了这个问题,这似乎对两者都有效。这不是你要找的吗?
  • 如果担心B中group的子顺序,只需在grp定义前加“-”即可,即grp=-c(0,cumsum(diff(subset$TRANSFER_NUM) -1))
猜你喜欢
  • 1970-01-01
  • 1970-01-01
  • 1970-01-01
  • 1970-01-01
  • 1970-01-01
  • 2021-02-09
  • 2011-03-01
  • 1970-01-01
  • 2021-02-14
相关资源
最近更新 更多