【发布时间】:2013-05-16 22:22:00
【问题描述】:
$query = "
SELECT a_orders.id, a_orders.billing, a_orders.type,
SUM(a_order_rows.quant_refunded*a_order_rows.price*((100-a_orders.discount)*.01)) as refund_total,
SUM(a_order_rows.quant*a_order_rows.price*((100-a_orders.discount)*.01)) as order_total,
GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT a_order_rows.date_refunded) as refund_dates
FROM a_order_rows JOIN a_orders
ON a_order_rows.order_id = a_orders.id
GROUP BY a_orders.id, a_orders.billing
HAVING MAX(a_order_rows.quant_refunded) > 0
ORDER BY a_order_rows.date_refunded DESC, a_orders.id DESC
LIMIT 50";
$query = "
SELECT a_orders.id, a_orders.billing, a_orders.type,
SUM(a_order_rows.quant_refunded*a_order_rows.price*((100-a_orders.discount)*.01))+a_orders.refund_adjustment as refund_total,
SUM(a_order_rows.quant*a_order_rows.price*((100-a_orders.discount)*.01)) as order_total,
GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT a_order_rows.date_refunded) as refund_dates
FROM a_order_rows JOIN a_orders
ON a_order_rows.order_id = a_orders.id
GROUP BY a_orders.id, a_orders.billing
HAVING MAX(a_order_rows.quant_refunded) > 0
ORDER BY a_order_rows.date_refunded DESC, a_orders.id DESC
LIMIT 50";
注意到查询 2 的第 2 行中的 +a_orders.refund_adjustment?只是添加它正在改变结果的顺序。如果选择该列而不将其添加到聚合中,也会发生同样的事情(例如,在第 1 行的a_orders.type, 之后添加a_orders.refund_adjustment,)。
将该列添加到组合中后,结果不再按date_refunded DESC 的预期排序。是什么赋予了?我无法理解这会如何以任何方式影响结果顺序。
【问题讨论】:
标签: sql select sql-order-by