我不明白你为什么要使用JOIN,因为这看起来很简单:
DELETE FROM subject_class WHERE subject_id = previous_subject_id?
另外,285,000 行并不是一个很大的数量,性能应该还不错。但是,285,000 * 285,000(810 亿)是一个很大的数字,这基本上就是您使用 JOIN 的查询必须解决的问题。
好的,现在我们有一个问题。在关系数据库中,没有“第一个”或“最后一个”的概念。行没有任何固有的顺序,除非你告诉他们要订购的东西。在您的示例中,您从列表中直观地选择了两行,这纯粹是因为当您列出它们时,这是它们出现的顺序。但是,该顺序是完全不确定的。这实际上可能是数据插入堆(非索引表)的顺序,但这几乎不可能复制,并且超出了这个问题的范围。
我能做的是提供一种确定性的方式来删除行。因为这比较复杂,所以我会设置一些测试数据:
DECLARE @subject_class TABLE (
subject_id INT,
subject_name VARCHAR(20),
[standard] VARCHAR(20),
[rank] INT,
previous_subject_id INT);
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 13, 'ABC', '1st', 1, 21;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 13, 'ABC', '1st', 1, 23;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 13, 'ABC', '1st', 1, 13;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 25, 'def', '3rd', 6, 42;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 25, 'def', '3rd', 6, 25;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 25, 'def', '3rd', 6, 28;
这基本上是您的设置,您在没有索引的表中列出的数据。
第一部分很简单:
DELETE FROM @subject_class WHERE subject_id = previous_subject_id; --fixes 2 records
第二部分稍微复杂一些,所以我使用的是公用表表达式:
WITH cte AS (
SELECT
subject_id,
MIN(previous_subject_id) AS min_previous_subject_id
FROM
@subject_class
GROUP BY
subject_id)
DELETE
s
FROM
@subject_class s
INNER JOIN cte c ON c.subject_id = s.subject_id AND c.min_previous_subject_id != s.previous_subject_id;
SELECT * FROM @subject_class;
首先确定每个subject_id 的最小值previous_subject_id 并假设这是我们想要保留的唯一一个。还有很多其他方法可以做到这一点,您可以选择最高值,或者想出一些更复杂的规则。
这并没有给你你所要求的,而是你得到的结果:
subject_id subject_name standard rank previous_subject_id
13 ABC 1st 1 21
25 def 3rd 6 28
但是,这是确定性的,因为每次运行查询都会得到相同的结果。
您希望查询仅删除与“其他”字段匹配的行,因此如下:
DECLARE @subject_class TABLE (
subject_id INT,
subject_name VARCHAR(20),
[standard] VARCHAR(20),
[rank] INT,
previous_subject_id INT);
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 13, 'ABC', '1st', 1, 21;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 13, 'ABF', '1st', 1, 23;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 13, 'ABC', '1st', 1, 13;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 25, 'def', '3rd', 6, 42;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 25, 'dez', '3rd', 6, 25;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 25, 'def', '3rd', 6, 28;
DELETE FROM @subject_class WHERE subject_id = previous_subject_id;
WITH cte AS (
SELECT
subject_id,
subject_name,
[standard],
[rank],
MIN(previous_subject_id) AS min_previous_subject_id
FROM
@subject_class
GROUP BY
subject_id,
subject_name,
[standard],
[rank])
DELETE
s
FROM
@subject_class s
INNER JOIN cte c ON c.subject_id = s.subject_id
AND c.subject_name = s.subject_name
AND c.[standard] = s.[standard]
AND c.[rank] = s.[rank]
WHERE
c.min_previous_subject_id != s.previous_subject_id;
SELECT * FROM @subject_class;
这次我们最终得到 3 行:
- “dez”的行仍然被删除,因为它具有相同的subject_id和previous_subject_id;
- 保留“ABF”行,因为它与主题名称不匹配。
这次更新数据:
DECLARE @subject_class TABLE (
subject_id INT,
subject_name VARCHAR(20),
[standard] VARCHAR(20),
[rank] INT,
previous_subject_id INT);
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 13, 'ABC', '1st', 1, 21;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 13, 'ABC', '1st', 1, 23;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 13, 'ABC', '1st', 1, 13;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 25, 'def', '3rd', 6, 42;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 25, 'def', '3rd', 6, 25;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 25, 'def', '3rd', 6, 28;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 25, 'XYZ', '2nd', 7, 26;
INSERT INTO @subject_class SELECT 29, 'PQR', '1st', 1, 31;
DELETE FROM @subject_class WHERE subject_id = previous_subject_id;
WITH cte AS (
SELECT
subject_id,
subject_name,
[standard],
[rank],
MIN(previous_subject_id) AS min_previous_subject_id
FROM
@subject_class
GROUP BY
subject_id,
subject_name,
[standard],
[rank])
DELETE
s
FROM
@subject_class s
INNER JOIN cte c ON c.subject_id = s.subject_id
AND c.subject_name = s.subject_name
AND c.[standard] = s.[standard]
AND c.[rank] = s.[rank]
WHERE
c.min_previous_subject_id != s.previous_subject_id;
SELECT * FROM @subject_class;
我得到以下结果:
subject_id subject_name standard rank previous_subject_id
13 ABC 1st 1 21
25 def 3rd 6 28
25 XYZ 2nd 7 26
29 PQR 1st 1 31
哪个符合您的预期?不完全是,但那是因为当没有这样的概念时,您仍在使用“第一个”。我得到的行数相同,结果基本相同。我只是选择了与你不同的行来保留。