我在 Lollipop 上遇到了同样的问题，并创建了两种方法来包装 Recyclerview 适配器。一个很容易使用，但我不确定它会如何处理不断变化的数据集。因为它包装了您的适配器，您需要确保自己在正确的适配器对象上调用 notifyDataSetChanged 之类的方法。
对方不应该有这样的问题。只需让您的常规适配器扩展类，实现抽象方法，您就应该准备好了。他们在这里：
要点
HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1
import android.support.v7.widget.RecyclerView;
import android.view.ViewGroup;
/**
* Created by sebnapi on 08.11.14.
* <p/>
* This is a Plug-and-Play Approach for adding a Header or Footer to
* a RecyclerView backed list
* <p/>
* Just wrap your regular adapter like this
* <p/>
* new HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1(new RegularAdapter())
* <p/>
* Let RegularAdapter implement HeaderRecyclerView, FooterRecyclerView or both
* and you are ready to go.
* <p/>
* I'm absolutely not sure how this will behave with changes in the dataset.
* You can always wrap a fresh adapter and make sure to not change the old one or
* use my other approach.
* <p/>
* With the other approach you need to let your Adapter extend HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2
* (and therefore change potentially more code) but possible omit these shortcomings.
* <p/>
* TOTALLY UNTESTED - USE WITH CARE - HAVE FUN :)
*/
public class HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1 extends RecyclerView.Adapter {
private static final int TYPE_HEADER = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
private static final int TYPE_FOOTER = Integer.MIN_VALUE + 1;
private static final int TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET = 2;
private final RecyclerView.Adapter mAdaptee;
public HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1(RecyclerView.Adapter adaptee) {
mAdaptee = adaptee;
}
public RecyclerView.Adapter getAdaptee() {
return mAdaptee;
}
@Override
public RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType) {
if (viewType == TYPE_HEADER && mAdaptee instanceof HeaderRecyclerView) {
return ((HeaderRecyclerView) mAdaptee).onCreateHeaderViewHolder(parent, viewType);
} else if (viewType == TYPE_FOOTER && mAdaptee instanceof FooterRecyclerView) {
return ((FooterRecyclerView) mAdaptee).onCreateFooterViewHolder(parent, viewType);
}
return mAdaptee.onCreateViewHolder(parent, viewType - TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET);
}
@Override
public void onBindViewHolder(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position) {
if (position == 0 && holder.getItemViewType() == TYPE_HEADER && useHeader()) {
((HeaderRecyclerView) mAdaptee).onBindHeaderView(holder, position);
} else if (position == mAdaptee.getItemCount() && holder.getItemViewType() == TYPE_FOOTER && useFooter()) {
((FooterRecyclerView) mAdaptee).onBindFooterView(holder, position);
} else {
mAdaptee.onBindViewHolder(holder, position - (useHeader() ? 1 : 0));
}
}
@Override
public int getItemCount() {
int itemCount = mAdaptee.getItemCount();
if (useHeader()) {
itemCount += 1;
}
if (useFooter()) {
itemCount += 1;
}
return itemCount;
}
private boolean useHeader() {
if (mAdaptee instanceof HeaderRecyclerView) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
private boolean useFooter() {
if (mAdaptee instanceof FooterRecyclerView) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
@Override
public int getItemViewType(int position) {
if (position == 0 && useHeader()) {
return TYPE_HEADER;
}
if (position == mAdaptee.getItemCount() && useFooter()) {
return TYPE_FOOTER;
}
if (mAdaptee.getItemCount() >= Integer.MAX_VALUE - TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET) {
new IllegalStateException("HeaderRecyclerViewAdapter offsets your BasicItemType by " + TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET + ".");
}
return mAdaptee.getItemViewType(position) + TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET;
}
public static interface HeaderRecyclerView {
public RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateHeaderViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType);
public void onBindHeaderView(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position);
}
public static interface FooterRecyclerView {
public RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateFooterViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType);
public void onBindFooterView(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position);
}
}
HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2
import android.support.v7.widget.RecyclerView;
import android.view.ViewGroup;
/**
* Created by sebnapi on 08.11.14.
* <p/>
* If you extend this Adapter you are able to add a Header, a Footer or both
* by a similar ViewHolder pattern as in RecyclerView.
* <p/>
* If you want to omit changes to your class hierarchy you can try the Plug-and-Play
* approach HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1.
* <p/>
* Don't override (Be careful while overriding)
* - onCreateViewHolder
* - onBindViewHolder
* - getItemCount
* - getItemViewType
* <p/>
* You need to override the abstract methods introduced by this class. This class
* is not using generics as RecyclerView.Adapter make yourself sure to cast right.
* <p/>
* TOTALLY UNTESTED - USE WITH CARE - HAVE FUN :)
*/
public abstract class HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2 extends RecyclerView.Adapter {
private static final int TYPE_HEADER = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
private static final int TYPE_FOOTER = Integer.MIN_VALUE + 1;
private static final int TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET = 2;
@Override
public RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType) {
if (viewType == TYPE_HEADER) {
return onCreateHeaderViewHolder(parent, viewType);
} else if (viewType == TYPE_FOOTER) {
return onCreateFooterViewHolder(parent, viewType);
}
return onCreateBasicItemViewHolder(parent, viewType - TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET);
}
@Override
public void onBindViewHolder(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position) {
if (position == 0 && holder.getItemViewType() == TYPE_HEADER) {
onBindHeaderView(holder, position);
} else if (position == getBasicItemCount() && holder.getItemViewType() == TYPE_FOOTER) {
onBindFooterView(holder, position);
} else {
onBindBasicItemView(holder, position - (useHeader() ? 1 : 0));
}
}
@Override
public int getItemCount() {
int itemCount = getBasicItemCount();
if (useHeader()) {
itemCount += 1;
}
if (useFooter()) {
itemCount += 1;
}
return itemCount;
}
@Override
public int getItemViewType(int position) {
if (position == 0 && useHeader()) {
return TYPE_HEADER;
}
if (position == getBasicItemCount() && useFooter()) {
return TYPE_FOOTER;
}
if (getBasicItemType(position) >= Integer.MAX_VALUE - TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET) {
new IllegalStateException("HeaderRecyclerViewAdapter offsets your BasicItemType by " + TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET + ".");
}
return getBasicItemType(position) + TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET;
}
public abstract boolean useHeader();
public abstract RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateHeaderViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType);
public abstract void onBindHeaderView(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position);
public abstract boolean useFooter();
public abstract RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateFooterViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType);
public abstract void onBindFooterView(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position);
public abstract RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateBasicItemViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType);
public abstract void onBindBasicItemView(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position);
public abstract int getBasicItemCount();
/**
* make sure you don't use [Integer.MAX_VALUE-1, Integer.MAX_VALUE] as BasicItemViewType
*
* @param position
* @return
*/
public abstract int getBasicItemType(int position);
}
感谢您的反馈和分叉。我将自己使用HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2，并在未来进行改进、测试和发布更改。
编辑：@OvidiuLatcu 是的，我遇到了一些问题。实际上，我停止通过position - (useHeader() ? 1 : 0) 隐式偏移标题，而是为它创建了一个公共方法int offsetPosition(int position)。因为如果你在Recyclerview上设置了OnItemTouchListener，就可以截取触摸，获取触摸的x,y坐标，找到对应的子视图然后调用recyclerView.getChildPosition(...)，你总会得到适配器中的非偏移位置！这是 RecyclerView 代码中的一个缺点，我没有看到一个简单的方法来克服这个问题。这就是为什么我现在需要通过我的自己的代码来显式偏移位置。