嵌套小元素

Question

嵌套small 元素是否有效且语义正确？

例如：

<section>
  <p>[…]</p>
  <p>What particular element of the time in which they were born has an effect on their character is something for which I still do not have a definitive conclusion, but the fact is as observable as it is impossible to ignore. People born around the same time are very similar (regarding those characteristics that are based on their birth dates, and isolating them from other elements such as physique, education, and others).</p>
  <footer>
    <p><small>[Note 2]</small> In the same way that it is possible to gather certain elements of an irrational person’s character from their physique, date of birth, and name, it is in turn possible to deduce these characteristics from the observations of the subject’s character.</p>
    <p><small>[Definitive examples can be found at <small>{A., No. 215}</small>.]</small></p>
  </footer>
</section>

问题不在于 my 示例在语义上是否正确，而在于嵌套 small 元素是否在语义上正确（在任何示例中）。

Answer 1

它在句法上有效。

---

至于语义：specification 说：

小字体通常包含免责声明、警告、法律限制或版权。小字体有时也用于署名或满足许可要求。

和

small 元素不会“降低”或降低 em 元素强调的文本的重要性，也不会降低 strong 元素标记为重要的文本的重要性。要将文本标记为不强调或不重要，请不要分别使用 em 或 strong 元素进行标记。

我看不出任何可以通过将小文本放在一段小文本中来表达的语义含义。

---

问题不在于我的示例在语义上是否正确，而在于嵌套小元素是否在语义上正确（在任何示例中）。

正如我所说，我想不出任何例子，但无论如何都要处理你的例子：

• <small>[Note 2]</small> 看起来应该是一个标题（或者可能是一个命名的锚点）。
• <small>[Definitive examples... 可能是旁白。
• <small>{A., No. 215}</small> 看起来应该是引用。