【发布时间】:2019-10-07 18:48:43
【问题描述】:
在 Testing with SQLite 上的 Entity Framework Core 文档中,示例代码为测试的每个步骤实例化一个新的 DbContext。这样做有什么理由吗?
// Copied from the docs:
[Fact]
public void Add_writes_to_database()
{
// In-memory database only exists while the connection is open
var connection = new SqliteConnection("DataSource=:memory:");
connection.Open();
try
{
var options = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<BloggingContext>()
.UseSqlite(connection)
.Options;
// Create the schema in the database
using (var context = new BloggingContext(options))
{
context.Database.EnsureCreated();
}
// Run the test against one instance of the context
using (var context = new BloggingContext(options))
{
var service = new BlogService(context);
service.Add("http://sample.com");
context.SaveChanges();
}
// Use a separate instance of the context to verify correct data was saved to database
using (var context = new BloggingContext(options))
{
Assert.Equal(1, context.Blogs.Count());
Assert.Equal("http://sample.com", context.Blogs.Single().Url);
}
}
finally
{
connection.Close();
}
}
// Why not do this instead:
[Fact]
public void Add_writes_to_database()
{
// In-memory database only exists while the connection is open
var connection = new SqliteConnection("DataSource=:memory:");
connection.Open();
try
{
var options = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<BloggingContext>()
.UseSqlite(connection)
.Options;
// Create the schema in the database
using (var context = new BloggingContext(options))
{
context.Database.EnsureCreated();
var service = new BlogService(context);
service.Add("http://sample.com");
context.SaveChanges();
Assert.Equal(1, context.Blogs.Count());
Assert.Equal("http://sample.com", context.Blogs.Single().Url);
}
}
finally
{
connection.Close();
}
}
为什么不实例化一次上下文,然后在整个测试方法中使用该实例,如第二个代码示例所示?
【问题讨论】:
-
如果您的测试连接到数据库,那么它就不是单元测试...它是一个集成测试。
-
好点,我编辑了标题
-
其实第三次创作的cmets讲的