【发布时间】:2015-03-26 18:39:29
【问题描述】:
有人能想出一个好方法来实现多重分派,比如下面的Object::foo 重载吗?
class A {
public:
virtual void accept (Visitor&) = 0;
};
class B : public A {
virtual void accept (Visitor&) override;
};
class C : public A {
virtual void accept (Visitor&) override;
};
class D : public A {
virtual void accept (Visitor&) override;
};
class Object {
public:
virtual double foo (A*, A*) { std::cout << "Object::foo A,A\n"; return 3.14; }
virtual double foo (B*, B*) { std::cout << "Object::foo B,B\n"; return 3.14; }
virtual double foo (B*, C*) { std::cout << "Object::foo B,C\n"; return 3.14; }
virtual double foo (C*, B*) { std::cout << "Object::foo C,B\n"; return 3.14; }
virtual double foo (C*, C*) { std::cout << "Object::foo C,C\n"; return 3.14; }
virtual char foo (A*, A*, A*) const { std::cout << "Object::foo A,A,A\n"; return '&'; }
virtual char foo (C*, B*, D*) const { std::cout << "Object::foo C,B,D\n"; return '!'; } // Overload of foo with three arguments.
virtual void bar (A*, A*, A*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar A,A,A\n"; }
virtual void bar (B*, B*, B*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar B,B,B\n"; }
virtual void bar (B*, C*, B*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar B,C,B\n"; }
virtual void bar (B*, C*, C*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar B,C,C\n"; }
virtual void bar (B*, C*, D*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar B,C,D\n"; }
virtual void bar (C*, B*, D*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar C,B,D\n"; }
virtual void bar (C*, C*, C*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar C,C,C\n"; }
virtual void bar (D*, B*, C*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar D,B,C\n"; }
double fooMultipleDispatch (A*, A*);
char fooMultipleDispatch (A*, A*, A*);
void barMultipleDispatch (A*, A*, A*);
template <template <int...> class Z1, template <int...> class Z2, int... Is, int... Js>
double multipleDispatch (const ObjectFooVisitor<2>& visitor, const Z1<Is...>&, const Z2<Js...>&) {return foo (visitor.getArray<Is>()[Js]...);}
template <template <int...> class Z1, template <int...> class Z2, int... Is, int... Js>
char multipleDispatch (const ObjectFooVisitor<3>& visitor, const Z1<Is...>&, const Z2<Js...>&) const {return foo (visitor.getArray<Is>()[Js]...);}
template <template <int...> class Z1, template <int...> class Z2, int... Is, int... Js>
void multipleDispatch (const ObjectBarVisitor& visitor, const Z1<Is...>&, const Z2<Js...>&) {bar (visitor.getArray<Is>()[Js]...);}
};
我用来执行多重调度的客户端代码如下所示:
int main() {
A* a[] = {new B, new C, new D};
Object* object = new Object;
double d = object->foo (a[0], a[1]); // Object::foo A,A (no multiple dispatch)
d = object->fooMultipleDispatch (a[0], a[1]); // Object::foo B,C
std::cout << "d = " << d << std::endl; // 3.12
const char k = object->fooMultipleDispatch (a[1], a[0], a[2]); // Object::foo C,B,D
std::cout << "k = " << k << std::endl; // !
object->bar (a[1], a[0], a[2]); // Object::bar A,A,A (no multiple dispatch)
object->barMultipleDispatch (a[1], a[0], a[2]); // Object::bar C,B,D
Thing* thing = new Thing;
int num = thing->baz (a[1], a[0], a[2]); // Thing::baz A,A,A (no multiple dispatch)
num = thing->bazMultipleDispatch (a[1], a[0], a[2]); // Thing::baz C,B,D
std::cout << "num = " << num << std::endl; // 5
}
您可以通过我的设计推断出我的解决方案在维护类别中非常失败。每次要多次分派具有重载的新函数时,都需要编写一个新的相应访问者类等...(例如,在这种情况下ObjectFooVisitor,函数Object::fooMultipleDispatch等...)。理想的设计不应该需要这种类型的维护工作。
我刚刚对多个调度 Object::foo 的一个示例访问者函数,如下所示:
template<>
class ObjectFooVisitor<2> : public Visitor { // For Object::foo overrides with two arguments.
private:
std::tuple<std::array<B*, 2>, std::array<C*, 2>> tupleOfArrays;
std::array<int, 2> tupleIndices;
// ....
};
double Object::fooMultipleDispatch (A* a1, A* a2) {
ObjectFooVisitor<2> visitor;
a1->accept(visitor); // Stores the dynamic type of a1
a2->accept(visitor); // and a2 into ObjectFooVisitor<2>'s array data members.
return MultipleDispatcher<Object, ObjectFooVisitor<2>, double, 2, 0, index_sequence<0>>(this, visitor).execute(); // 2 because there are two arguments in the Object::foo overloads.
}
所以我遵循的主要思想是存储动态类型指针数组的元组,然后使用此存储来调用适当的重载。但必须有其他设计才能更好地发挥作用。
如果您想查看它,这是我的完整解决方案(在 GCC 4.9.2 上编译,需要 SFINAE 支持)。随意尝试改进它,使其更易于维护,但我确信需要新的设计。
#include <iostream>
#include <array>
#include <tuple>
#include <type_traits>
class Object; class B; class C; class D;
class Visitor {
public:
virtual void visit (B*) = 0;
virtual void visit (C*) = 0;
virtual void visit (D*) = 0;
};
class A {
public:
virtual void accept (Visitor&) = 0;
};
class B : public A {
virtual void accept (Visitor&) override;
};
class C : public A {
virtual void accept (Visitor&) override;
};
class D : public A {
virtual void accept (Visitor&) override;
};
template <int, int> struct ArrayType; // Extra template parameter N needed here to allow std::array of any size.
template <int N> struct ArrayType<N,0> { using type = std::array<B*, N>; };
template <int N> struct ArrayType<N,1> { using type = std::array<C*, N>; };
template <int N> struct ArrayType<N,2> { using type = std::array<D*, N>; };
template <int> class ObjectFooVisitor;
template<>
class ObjectFooVisitor<2> : public Visitor { // For Object::foo overrides with two arguments.
private:
std::tuple<std::array<B*, 2>, std::array<C*, 2>> tupleOfArrays;
std::array<int, 2> tupleIndices;
int numAccepted = 0;
protected:
virtual void visit (B* b) override {std::get<0>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = b; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 0;}
virtual void visit (C* c) override {std::get<1>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = c; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 1;}
virtual void visit (D*) override {}
public:
ObjectFooVisitor() { std::get<0>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr}}; std::get<1>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr}}; }
template <int N> const typename ArrayType<2,N>::type& getArray() const {return std::get<N>(tupleOfArrays);}
const std::array<int, 2>& getTupleIndices() const {return tupleIndices;}
};
template<>
class ObjectFooVisitor<3> : public Visitor { // For Object::foo overrides with three arguments.
private:
std::tuple<std::array<B*, 3>, std::array<C*, 3>, std::array<D*, 3>> tupleOfArrays;
std::array<int, 3> tupleIndices;
int numAccepted = 0;
protected:
virtual void visit (B* b) override {std::get<0>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = b; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 0;}
virtual void visit (C* c) override {std::get<1>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = c; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 1;}
virtual void visit (D* d) override {std::get<2>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = d; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 2;}
public:
ObjectFooVisitor() { std::get<0>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr, nullptr}}; std::get<1>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr, nullptr}}; std::get<2>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr, nullptr}}; }
template <int N> const typename ArrayType<3,N>::type& getArray() const {return std::get<N>(tupleOfArrays);}
const std::array<int, 3>& getTupleIndices() const {return tupleIndices;}
};
class ObjectBarVisitor : public Visitor {
private:
std::tuple<std::array<B*, 3>, std::array<C*, 3>, std::array<D*, 3>> tupleOfArrays;
std::array<int, 3> tupleIndices;
int numAccepted = 0;
protected:
virtual void visit (B* b) override {std::get<0>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = b; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 0;}
virtual void visit (C* c) override {std::get<1>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = c; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 1;}
virtual void visit (D* d) override {std::get<2>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = d; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 2;}
public:
ObjectBarVisitor() { std::get<0>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr, nullptr}}; std::get<1>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr, nullptr}}; std::get<2>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr, nullptr}}; }
template <int N> const typename ArrayType<3,N>::type& getArray() const {return std::get<N>(tupleOfArrays);}
const std::array<int, 3>& getTupleIndices() const {return tupleIndices;}
};
class ThingBazVisitor : public Visitor {
private:
std::tuple<std::array<B*, 3>, std::array<C*, 3>, std::array<D*, 3>> tupleOfArrays;
std::array<int, 3> tupleIndices;
int numAccepted = 0;
protected:
virtual void visit (B* b) override {std::get<0>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = b; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 0;}
virtual void visit (C* c) override {std::get<1>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = c; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 1;}
virtual void visit (D* d) override {std::get<2>(tupleOfArrays)[numAccepted] = d; tupleIndices[numAccepted++] = 2;}
public:
ThingBazVisitor() { std::get<0>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr, nullptr}}; std::get<1>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr, nullptr}}; std::get<2>(tupleOfArrays) = {{nullptr, nullptr, nullptr}}; }
template <int N> const typename ArrayType<3,N>::type& getArray() const {return std::get<N>(tupleOfArrays);}
const std::array<int, 3>& getTupleIndices() const {return tupleIndices;}
};
void B::accept (Visitor& visitor) {visitor.visit(this);}
void C::accept (Visitor& visitor) {visitor.visit(this);}
void D::accept (Visitor& visitor) {visitor.visit(this);}
class Object {
public:
virtual double foo (A*, A*) { std::cout << "Object::foo A,A\n"; return 3.14; }
virtual double foo (B*, B*) { std::cout << "Object::foo B,B\n"; return 3.14; }
virtual double foo (B*, C*) { std::cout << "Object::foo B,C\n"; return 3.14; }
virtual double foo (C*, B*) { std::cout << "Object::foo C,B\n"; return 3.14; }
virtual double foo (C*, C*) { std::cout << "Object::foo C,C\n"; return 3.14; }
virtual char foo (A*, A*, A*) const { std::cout << "Object::foo A,A,A\n"; return '&'; } // This is needed for the foo overload to be multiple dispatched, even if it is never used, otherwise the other possible foo overloads with three arguments will have no place to go to.
virtual char foo (C*, B*, D*) const { std::cout << "Object::foo C,B,D\n"; return '!'; } // Overload of foo with three arguments. Furthermore, the function itself is const and returns char instead of double. Simply define char fooMultipleDispatch (A*, A*, A*), ObjectFooVisitor<3> (the old ObjectFooVisitor now renamed to ObjectFooVisitor<2>) and overload multipleDispatch with char multipleDispatch (const ObjectFooVisitor<3>& visitor, const Z1<Is...>&, const Z2<Js...>&).
virtual void bar (A*, A*, A*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar A,A,A\n"; }
virtual void bar (B*, B*, B*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar B,B,B\n"; }
virtual void bar (B*, C*, B*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar B,C,B\n"; }
virtual void bar (B*, C*, C*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar B,C,C\n"; }
virtual void bar (B*, C*, D*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar B,C,D\n"; }
virtual void bar (C*, B*, D*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar C,B,D\n"; }
virtual void bar (C*, C*, C*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar C,C,C\n"; }
virtual void bar (D*, B*, C*) const { std::cout << "Object::bar D,B,C\n"; }
double fooMultipleDispatch (A*, A*);
char fooMultipleDispatch (A*, A*, A*);
void barMultipleDispatch (A*, A*, A*);
template <template <int...> class Z1, template <int...> class Z2, int... Is, int... Js>
double multipleDispatch (const ObjectFooVisitor<2>& visitor, const Z1<Is...>&, const Z2<Js...>&) {return foo (visitor.getArray<Is>()[Js]...);}
template <template <int...> class Z1, template <int...> class Z2, int... Is, int... Js>
char multipleDispatch (const ObjectFooVisitor<3>& visitor, const Z1<Is...>&, const Z2<Js...>&) const {return foo (visitor.getArray<Is>()[Js]...);}
template <template <int...> class Z1, template <int...> class Z2, int... Is, int... Js>
void multipleDispatch (const ObjectBarVisitor& visitor, const Z1<Is...>&, const Z2<Js...>&) {bar (visitor.getArray<Is>()[Js]...);}
};
class Thing {
public:
virtual int baz (A*, A*, A*) { std::cout << "Thing::baz A,A,A\n"; return 5; }
virtual int baz (B*, B*, B*) { std::cout << "Thing::baz B,B,B\n"; return 5; }
virtual int baz (B*, C*, B*) { std::cout << "Thing::baz B,C,B\n"; return 5; }
virtual int baz (B*, C*, C*) { std::cout << "Thing::baz B,C,C\n"; return 5; }
virtual int baz (B*, C*, D*) { std::cout << "Thing::baz B,C,D\n"; return 5; }
virtual int baz (C*, B*, D*) { std::cout << "Thing::baz C,B,D\n"; return 5; }
virtual int baz (C*, C*, C*) { std::cout << "Thing::baz C,C,C\n"; return 5; }
virtual int baz (D*, B*, C*) { std::cout << "Thing::baz D,B,C\n"; return 5; }
int bazMultipleDispatch (A*, A*, A*);
template <template <int...> class Z1, template <int...> class Z2, int... Is, int... Js>
int multipleDispatch (const ThingBazVisitor& visitor, const Z1<Is...>&, const Z2<Js...>&) {return baz (visitor.getArray<Is>()[Js]...);} // Since Thing only has baz interested in multiple dispatching, it does not need its own MultipleDispatch inner class like Object does (but if other Thing methods want multiple dispatching, then as in the Object::multipleDispatch overloads).
};
template <typename, typename, typename, int, int, typename, typename = void, int = 0> struct MultipleDispatcher;
template <typename T, typename V, typename R, int Num, int N, template <int...> class Z, int... Is, int I>
struct MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, N, Z<I, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<N != Num-1>::type> : MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, N, Z<I+1, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<N != Num-1>::type> {
T* t;
const V& visitor;
MultipleDispatcher (T* o, const V& v) : MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, N, Z<I+1, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<N != Num-1>::type>(o,v), t(o), visitor(v) {}
R execute();
};
template <typename T, typename V, typename R, int Num, int Last, template <int...> class Z, int... Is, int I>
struct MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, Last, Z<I, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<Last == Num-1>::type> : MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, Last, Z<I+1, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<Last == Num-1>::type> {
T* t;
const V& visitor;
MultipleDispatcher (T* o, const V& v) : MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, Last, Z<I+1, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<Last == Num-1>::type>(o,v), t(o), visitor(v) {}
R execute();
};
template <typename T, typename V, typename R, int Num, int N, template <int...> class Z, int... Is>
struct MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, N, Z<Num, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<N != Num-1>::type> {
T* t;
const V& visitor;
MultipleDispatcher (T* o, const V& v) : t(o), visitor(v) {}
R execute() {return R();} // End of recursion
};
template <typename T, typename V, typename R, int Num, int Last, template <int...> class Z, int... Is>
struct MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, Last, Z<Num, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<Last == Num-1>::type> { // This unique specialization is needed to avoid compiling ambiguity.
T* t;
const V& visitor;
MultipleDispatcher (T* o, const V& v) : t(o), visitor(v) {}
R execute() {return R();} // End of recursion
};
template <typename T, typename V, typename R, int Num, int N, template <int...> class Z, int... Is, int I>
R MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, N, Z<I, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<N != Num-1>::type>::execute() {
if (I == visitor.getTupleIndices()[N])
return MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, N+1, Z<0, I, Is...>, void>(t, visitor).execute(); // Do we need to specify the std::enable_if part here? Apparently not. We will allow N+1 to be anything, and there is apparently no ambiguity.
else
return MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, N, Z<I+1, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<N != Num-1>::type>::execute();
}
template <int...> struct index_sequence {};
template <int N, int... Is>
struct make_index_sequence_helper : make_index_sequence_helper<N-1, N-1, Is...> {};
template <int... Is>
struct make_index_sequence_helper<0, Is...> {
using type = index_sequence<Is...>;
};
template <int N>
using make_index_sequence = typename make_index_sequence_helper<N>::type;
template <typename, typename> struct ReverseHelper;
template <template <int...> class Z, typename Pack>
struct ReverseHelper<Z<>, Pack> {
using type = Pack;
};
template <template <int...> class Z, int First, int... Rest, int... Is>
struct ReverseHelper<Z<First, Rest...>, Z<Is...>> : ReverseHelper<Z<Rest...>, Z<First, Is...>> {};
template <typename> struct Reverse;
template <template <int...> class Z, int... Is>
struct Reverse<Z<Is...>> : ReverseHelper<Z<Is...>, Z<>> {};
template <typename T, typename V, typename R, int Num, int Last, template <int...> class Z, int... Is, int I>
R MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, Last, Z<I, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<Last == Num-1>::type>::execute() {
if (I == visitor.getTupleIndices()[Last])
return t->template multipleDispatch (visitor, typename Reverse<Z<I, Is...>>::type{}, make_index_sequence<Num>{}); // This compiles on GCC 4.9.2 but not on GCC 4.8.1. Template disambiguator needed.
else
return MultipleDispatcher<T, V, R, Num, Last, Z<I+1, Is...>, typename std::enable_if<Last == Num-1>::type>::execute();
}
double Object::fooMultipleDispatch (A* a1, A* a2) {
ObjectFooVisitor<2> visitor;
a1->accept(visitor); // Stores the dynamic type of a1
a2->accept(visitor); // and a2 into ObjectFooVisitor<2>'s array data members.
return MultipleDispatcher<Object, ObjectFooVisitor<2>, double, 2, 0, index_sequence<0>>(this, visitor).execute(); // 2 because there are two arguments in the Object::foo overloads.
}
char Object::fooMultipleDispatch (A* a1, A* a2, A* a3) {
ObjectFooVisitor<3> visitor;
a1->accept(visitor);
a2->accept(visitor);
a3->accept(visitor);
return MultipleDispatcher<Object, ObjectFooVisitor<3>, char, 3, 0, index_sequence<0>>(this, visitor).execute(); // 3 because there are three arguments in this particular Object::foo overload.
}
void Object::barMultipleDispatch (A* a1, A* a2, A* a3) {
ObjectBarVisitor visitor;
a1->accept(visitor);
a2->accept(visitor);
a3->accept(visitor);
MultipleDispatcher<Object, ObjectBarVisitor, void, 3, 0, index_sequence<0>>(this, visitor).execute(); // 3 because there are two arguments in the Object::foo overloads.
}
int Thing::bazMultipleDispatch (A* a1, A* a2, A* a3) {
ThingBazVisitor visitor;
a1->accept(visitor);
a2->accept(visitor);
a3->accept(visitor);
return MultipleDispatcher<Thing, ThingBazVisitor, int, 3, 0, index_sequence<0>>(this, visitor).execute(); // 3 because there are three arguments in the Thing::baz overloads.
}
// Test
int main() {
A* a[] = {new B, new C, new D};
Object* object = new Object;
double d = object->foo (a[0], a[1]); // Object::foo A,A (no multiple dispatch)
d = object->fooMultipleDispatch (a[0], a[1]); // Object::foo B,C
std::cout << "d = " << d << std::endl; // 3.12
const char k = object->fooMultipleDispatch (a[1], a[0], a[2]); // Object::foo C,B,D
std::cout << "k = " << k << std::endl; // !
object->bar (a[1], a[0], a[2]); // Object::bar A,A,A (no multiple dispatch)
object->barMultipleDispatch (a[1], a[0], a[2]); // Object::bar C,B,D
Thing* thing = new Thing;
int num = thing->baz (a[1], a[0], a[2]); // Thing::baz A,A,A (no multiple dispatch)
num = thing->bazMultipleDispatch (a[1], a[0], a[2]); // Thing::baz C,B,D
std::cout << "num = " << num << std::endl; // 5
}
【问题讨论】:
-
What I've done 可能会有所帮助。
-
所以它是组合超过 2 个对象的多重调度?
-
@Jarod。我无法让您的设计与 Object::foo 重载一起使用。是否需要一些调整才能使用成员函数? Christophe,一个 MultipleDIspatcher 类,可以处理任何对象的任何成员函数重载,是的,多个对象作为参数传递,并使用了它们的动态类型。
-
@prestokeys:您可以使用
dispatch<double, IAVisitor>([object](auto& a1, auto& a2) { object->foo(&a1, &a2); }, *a[0], *a[2]);(在 C++14 中)之类的名称来调用它,或者创建一个命名的等效函子对象。 -
@prestokeys:根据您的情况调整示例:ideone.com/b3I8Yy
标签: c++ virtual multiple-dispatch