【发布时间】:2021-12-21 10:55:22
【问题描述】:
我目前正在评估 Generics.SOP 的用例,该用例涉及从给定数据类型定义派生新的相关数据类型。
我想从定义表示 lambda 项的数据类型的“de Bruijinized”版本开始:
-- The reproducer needs only some of the LANGUAGE pragmas and imports,
-- but it might be convenient for your (or my) solutions
{-# LANGUAGE GeneralisedNewtypeDeriving #-}
{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-}
{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-}
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeApplications #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TemplateHaskell #-}
module SOP where
import Data.SOP.NS
import Generics.SOP
import Generics.SOP.TH
import Data.Kind
newtype Var = V String
deriving (Eq, Ord, Show)
newtype BindingOcc = B Var
deriving (Eq, Ord, Show)
data Expr
= Var Var
| App Expr Expr
| Lam BindingOcc Expr
deriveGeneric ''Expr -- Code Expr = '[ '[Var], '[Expr, Expr], '[BindingOcc, Expr]]
要导出Expr 的de Bruijinized 版本,我必须删除所有BindingOccs(然后添加一个新的'[Int] 替代项,但要一步一步)。 我该怎么做?也许有一个函数
-- Let's be absolutely explicit about it and inline `Code`
-- Also don't want to confuse the type-checker with a type
-- family that removes the field just yet
deleteBindingOcc_SOP :: SOP I '[ '[Var], '[Expr, Expr], '[BindingOcc, Expr]]
-> SOP I '[ '[Var], '[Expr, Expr], '[Expr]]
deleteBindingOcc_SOP arg = SOP $ trans_NS Proxy {- will be filled in below -} deleteBindingOcc_NP (unSOP arg)
deleteBindingOcc_NP :: NP I xs -> NP I (WithoutBindingOccs xs)
deleteBindingOcc_NP Nil = Nil
deleteBindingOcc_NP (x :* xs)
| B _ <- x = deleteBindingOcc_NP xs
| otherwise = x :* deleteBindingOcc_NP xs
-- I guess I expected to write the following type family
type family WithoutBindingOcc (xs :: [Type]) :: [Type] where
WithoutBindingOcc '[] = '[]
WithoutBindingOcc (BindingOcc ': xs) = WithoutBindingOcc xs
WithoutBindingOcc (x ': xs) = x ': WithoutBindingOcc xs
但是,可惜的是,这并没有进行类型检查;一方面,我在deleteBindingOcc_NP的定义中在运行时匹配xs的参数多态头,所以我需要一个单例编码/派生一个类型类,只是为了定义我的小助手函数deleteBindingOcc_NP。
这里是:
-- Now we know the full type of the proxy, carrying the constraint that `deleteBindingOcc_NP` wants
deleteBindingOcc_SOP arg = SOP $ trans_NS (Proxy :: Proxy MyC) deleteBindingOcc_NP (unSOP arg)
class b ~ WithoutBindingOcc a => MyC a b where -- welp
deleteBindingOcc_NP :: NP I a -> NP I b
instance MyC '[] '[] where
deleteBindingOcc_NP Nil = Nil
instance {-# OVERLAPPING #-} MyC a b => MyC (BindingOcc ': a) b where
deleteBindingOcc_NP (_ :* xs) = deleteBindingOcc_NP xs
instance {-# OVERLAPPABLE #-} MyC a b => MyC (x ': a) (x ': b) where
deleteBindingOcc_NP (x :* xs) = x :* deleteBindingOcc_NP xs
但即使这样也行不通,因为重叠的实例不会进行类型检查:
• Could not deduce: WithoutBindingOcc (x : a) ~ (x : b)
arising from the superclasses of an instance declaration
from the context: MyC a b
bound by the instance declaration at SOP2.hs:52:31-62
• In the instance declaration for ‘MyC (x : a) (x : b)’
|
52 | instance {-# OVERLAPPABLE #-} MyC a b => MyC (x ': a) (x ': b) where
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
稍微考虑一下,这并不奇怪:没有保证后一种类型类永远不会在其头部 BindingOcc 实例化 x,这是我们的类型家人应该删除。所以看来基于类型类的方法不是我想要的。
我的问题是:如何使用给定的类型签名编写 deleteBindingOcc_SOP,使其与不同但相似相关的 Codes 一起使用?
我担心 Code 表示作为 元语言 Type 结构列表的列表可能不适合实现我想要的。不知何故,我们无法知道所有Types 实际上都已关闭并且不会被进一步替换。
【问题讨论】: