【发布时间】:2014-07-01 17:19:56
【问题描述】:
用内存优化表替换大表
对于某些东西,我对它死掉的某些东西有很好的响应时间
它是一个复合主键
我可以让它使用主键的唯一方法是搜索特定行(整个 PK)
不会使用 PK 进行排序或仅使用复合键的一个组件
根据现有数据调整哈希桶的大小
使用此链接中的语法作为复合主键
Hekaton: Composite Primary Key in create table statement
CREATE TABLE (SQL Server)
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[FTSindex]
(
[sID] [int] NOT NULL,
[wordPos] [int] NOT NULL,
[wordID] [int] NOT NULL,
[charPos] [int] NOT NULL,
INDEX [ix_wordID_MO_2] NONCLUSTERED HASH
(
[wordID]
)WITH ( BUCKET_COUNT = 524288),
CONSTRAINT [pk_FTSindexMO_2] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED HASH
(
[sID],
[wordPos]
)WITH ( BUCKET_COUNT = 268435456)
)WITH ( MEMORY_OPTIMIZED = ON , DURABILITY = SCHEMA_ONLY )
select top 10 * from [FTSindex] where [sID] = 100
-- runs in 0 seconds
-- Index Seek on ix_wordID_MO_2
-- it is NOT using the PRIMARY KEY pk_FTSindexMO_2
select top 10 * from [FTSindex] where [wordPos] = 100
-- never finishes (I only waited 10 minutes)
-- will not even display an execution plan
select top 10 * from [FTSindex] where [sID] = 100 and [wordPos] < 1000
-- never finishes (I only waited 10 minutes)
-- will not even display an execution plan
select top 10 * from [FTSindex] order by [sID]
-- never finishes (I only waited 10 minutes)
-- query plan is Table Scan
select top 10 * from [FTSindex] order by [sID], [wordPos]
-- never finishes (I only waited 10 minutes)
-- will not even display an execution plan
select top 10 * from [FTSindex] where [wordID] = 100 and [sID] = 856515
-- runs in 0 seconds
-- Index Seek on ix_wordID_MO_2
select top 10 * from [FTSindex] where [wordID] = 100 and [sID] = 856515 and [wordPos] < 1000
-- never finishes (I only waited 10 minutes)
-- will not even display an execution plan
select * from [FTSindex] where [sID] = 100
-- 45 seconds to return 1500 rows
-- table scan
select * from [FTSindex] where [sID] = 100 and [wordPos] = 1133
-- runs in 0 seconds
-- this uses the pk_FTSindexMO_2
-- this is the only way I could get it to use the primary key
注意原文(非内存优化表)
所有这些查询都在 0 秒内运行
我不是说每个
全部在 0 秒内运行
我想这总结了我的问题
Troubleshooting Common Performance Problems with Memory-Optimized Hash Indexes
不使用 HASH 作为主键似乎已经解决了它
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[FTSindex]
(
[sID] [int] NOT NULL,
[wordPos] [int] NOT NULL,
[wordID] [int] NOT NULL,
[charPos] [int] NOT NULL,
INDEX [ix_wordID_MO_2] NONCLUSTERED HASH
(
[wordID]
)WITH ( BUCKET_COUNT = 524288),
CONSTRAINT [pk_FTSindexMO_2] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[sID] ASC,
[wordPos] ASC
)
)WITH ( MEMORY_OPTIMIZED = ON , DURABILITY = SCHEMA_ONLY )
最后请注意,我会回到旧的基于磁盘的表
在应用程序使用内存优化的实际查询中较慢
优化的内存确实加载得更快,但是这个表是一次写入,多次读取
【问题讨论】:
-
你没有提到你有多少条记录。
-
@HamletHakobyan 这有什么关系?前 10 名甚至没有运行,甚至不会显示查询计划。就像 2 亿行一样。我说我根据现有数据调整了存储桶的大小。
-
尝试使用
OPTION (FAST 10)提示并告诉我结果。 -
@HamletHakobyan 在 OPTION (FAST 10) 上没有区别。但我更新了这个问题。如果我搜索整个 PK,那么它将使用 PK。
标签: tsql query-optimization sql-server-2014 memory-optimized-tables