可以一直使用np.einsum:
>>> a = np.arange(11*5*5).reshape(11,5,5)
>>> np.einsum('...ijk->...i',a)/(a.shape[-1]*a.shape[-2])
array([ 12, 37, 62, 87, 112, 137, 162, 187, 212, 237, 262])
适用于更高维的数组(如果轴标签发生更改,所有这些方法都可以):
>>> a = np.arange(10*11*5*5).reshape(10,11,5,5)
>>> (np.einsum('...ijk->...i',a)/(a.shape[-1]*a.shape[-2])).shape
(10, 11)
启动速度更快:
a = np.arange(11*5*5).reshape(11,5,5)
%timeit a.reshape(11, 25).mean(axis=1)
10000 loops, best of 3: 21.4 us per loop
%timeit a.mean(axis=(1,2))
10000 loops, best of 3: 19.4 us per loop
%timeit np.einsum('...ijk->...i',a)/(a.shape[-1]*a.shape[-2])
100000 loops, best of 3: 8.26 us per loop
随着数组大小的增加,比其他方法稍微好一些。
使用dtype=np.float64 不会明显改变上述时间,所以请仔细检查:
a = np.arange(110*50*50,dtype=np.float64).reshape(110,50,50)
%timeit a.reshape(110,2500).mean(axis=1)
1000 loops, best of 3: 307 us per loop
%timeit a.mean(axis=(1,2))
1000 loops, best of 3: 308 us per loop
%timeit np.einsum('...ijk->...i',a)/(a.shape[-1]*a.shape[-2])
10000 loops, best of 3: 145 us per loop
还有一些有趣的事情:
%timeit np.sum(a) #37812362500.0
100000 loops, best of 3: 293 us per loop
%timeit np.einsum('ijk->',a) #37812362500.0
100000 loops, best of 3: 144 us per loop