如果你查看np.savetxt 的源代码,你会发现,虽然有相当多的代码来处理参数以及 Python 2 和 Python 3 之间的差异,但它最终是一个简单的 Python 循环在行上,其中每一行都被格式化并写入文件。因此,如果您自己编写,您不会失去任何性能。例如,下面是一个精简的函数,它写入紧凑的零:
def savetxt_compact(fname, x, fmt="%.6g", delimiter=','):
with open(fname, 'w') as fh:
for row in x:
line = delimiter.join("0" if value == 0 else fmt % value for value in row)
fh.write(line + '\n')
例如:
In [70]: x
Out[70]:
array([[ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 1.2345 ],
[ 0. , 9.87654321, 0. , 0. , 0. ],
[ 0. , 3.14159265, 0. , 0. , 0. ],
[ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. ],
[ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. ],
[ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. ]])
In [71]: savetxt_compact('foo.csv', x, fmt='%.4f')
In [72]: !cat foo.csv
0,0,0,0,1.2345
0,9.8765,0,0,0
0,3.1416,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0
那么,只要你在写自己的savetxt 函数,还不如让它处理稀疏矩阵,这样你就不必在保存之前将其转换为(密集)numpy 数组。 (我假设稀疏数组是使用来自scipy.sparse 的稀疏表示之一实现的。)在以下函数中,唯一的变化是从... for value in row 到... for value in row.A[0]。
def savetxt_sparse_compact(fname, x, fmt="%.6g", delimiter=','):
with open(fname, 'w') as fh:
for row in x:
line = delimiter.join("0" if value == 0 else fmt % value for value in row.A[0])
fh.write(line + '\n')
例子:
In [112]: a
Out[112]:
<6x5 sparse matrix of type '<type 'numpy.float64'>'
with 3 stored elements in Compressed Sparse Row format>
In [113]: a.A
Out[113]:
array([[ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 1.2345 ],
[ 0. , 9.87654321, 0. , 0. , 0. ],
[ 0. , 3.14159265, 0. , 0. , 0. ],
[ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. ],
[ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. ],
[ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. ]])
In [114]: savetxt_sparse_compact('foo.csv', a, fmt='%.4f')
In [115]: !cat foo.csv
0,0,0,0,1.2345
0,9.8765,0,0,0
0,3.1416,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0
0,0,0,0,0