【问题标题】:python keras - Predicting time series, with few historical samples based on similar seriespython keras - 预测时间序列,基于相似序列的历史样本很少
【发布时间】:2020-08-12 12:02:52
【问题描述】:

我正在尝试使用 Keras 构建一个模型,以根据传感器的类型和相同类型传感器的历史数据来预测传感器的时间序列。

下图显示了 3 个时间序列,由 3 个相同类型的传感器生成,绿色虚线是新传感器数据,垂直线是新传感器数据的结束位置。

我曾尝试编写一个 LSTM 网络,该网络基于其他传感器的历史数据进行训练,一次提供一个历史数据,但这导致 LSTM 在预测新传感器时会考虑传感器的最后一天.

所以我猜我走错了路。根据同一类型的其他时间序列的历史,仅使用几个历史样本来预测时间序列有哪些选择?

任何帮助/参考/视频将不胜感激。

更新:
我想详细说明一下,传感器“分数”(如上图所示)是从随时间收集的一组特征生成的。即:

(event_1_count ,event_2_count ,event_3_count ,days_since_last_event_1 ) = 分数


+----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
|sensor_id |day |event_1_count |event_2_count |event_3_count |days_since_last_event_1 |
+----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
| 1        |0   | 2            | 1            | 0            | 0                      |
+----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
| 1        |1   | 0            | 10           | 2            | 1                      |
+----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
| 1        |2   | 0            | 1            | 0            | 2                      |
... until last day
+----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
| 2        |0   | 2            | 1            | 0            | 0                      |
+----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
| 2        |1   | 0            | 10           | 2            | 1                      |
+----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
| 2        |2   | 0            | 1            | 0            | 2                      |
... until last day
+----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
| 3        |0   | 2            | 1            | 0            | 0                      |
+----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
| 3        |1   | 0            | 10           | 2            | 1                      |
+----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
| 3        |2   | 0            | 1            | 0            | 2                      |
... until last day

然后以同样的方式收集新数据(绿线),但现在我只有前 3 天

    +----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
    |sensor_id |day |event_1_count |event_2_count |event_3_count |days_since_last_event_1 |
    +----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
    | 4        |0   | 2            | 1            | 0            | 0                      |
    +----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
    | 4        |1   | 0            | 10           | 2            | 1                      |
    +----------+----+--------------+--------------+--------------+------------------------+
    | 4        |2   | 0            | 1            | 0            | 2                      |
---END OF DATA---

很明显,我需要考虑新功能。我最初的想法是在考虑历史特征的情况下尝试学习波浪的“形状”,并根据该模型预测新传感器数据的形状。

我已将这个GoogleColab notebook 分享给@David 解决方案以供评论

【问题讨论】:

  • 您是否考虑过查看其他时间序列的mean 或“中位数”,而不是单独查看每个?当您假设他们的行为“相似”时,这可能更容易预测
  • green_nextday = function(green_tillnow, red, blue, yellow)吗?或者,green_nextday = function1(green_tillnow); green_tillnow = function2(red, blue, yellow)?
  • 我的一般建议是查看时间序列 (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cointegration) 的协整(多协整)。基本上,如果你能判断出绿线与其他三种颜色有一些线性关系,具有随机趋势,那么你就可以预测它。
  • 感谢大家的 cmets,mean 在这里没有用,因为在现实生活中的数据中,方差比我绘制的要大,并且某些传感器数据可能是平坦的,具体取决于它们的历史。而且我在预测时只有绿色数据green_nextday = function1(green_tillnow);

标签: python keras time-series


【解决方案1】:

有不同的方法,具体取决于您的确切设置和所需的输出。

A 版

如果您想拥有一个 LSTM 模型,它可以获取大量数据并预测下一步,这里有一个自包含的示例。

合成数据与您的图中显示的数据仅适度相似,但我希望它仍然有助于说明。

上方面板中的预测显示了所有时间序列块都已知并且每个时间序列块都预测下一步的情况。

下面的面板显示了更现实的情况,其中所讨论的时间序列的开始是已知的,并且它的其余部分是迭代预测的,一次一步。显然,预测误差可能会随着时间的推移而累积和增长。

# import modules
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import keras
import keras.models
import keras.layers
import sklearn
import sklearn.metrics

# please load auxiliary functions defined below!
# (omitted here for better readability)

# set seed
np.random.seed(42)

# number of time series
n_samples = 5

# number of steps used for prediction
n_steps = 50

# number of epochs for LSTM training
epochs = 100

# create synthetic data
# (see bottom left panel below, very roughly resembling your data)
tab = create_data(n_samples)

# train model without first column
x_train, y_train = prepare_data(tab.iloc[:, 1:], n_steps=n_steps)
model, history = train_model(x_train, y_train, n_steps=n_steps, epochs=epochs)

# predict first column for testing
# (all chunks are known and only on time step is predicted for each)
veo = tab[0].copy().values
y_test, y_pred = predict_all(veo, model)

# predict iteratively
# (first chunk is known and new values are predicted iteratively)
vec = veo.copy()
y_iter = predict_iterative(vec, n_steps, model)

# plot results
plot_single(y_test, [y_pred, y_iter], n_steps)

版本 B

如果您的时间序列的总长度已知且固定,并且您希望“自动完成”不完整的时间序列(图中的绿色虚线),则同时预测多个值可能更容易、更可靠。

但是,因为对于每个时间序列,您只将起始块作为训练数据(并预测其余部分),这可能需要更完全已知的时间序列。

不过,因为每个时间序列在训练期间只使用一次(而不是分成许多连续的块),所以训练速度更快,结果看起来还不错。

# please load auxiliary functions defined below!
# (omitted here for better readability)

# number of time series
n_samples = 10

# create synthetic data
# (see bottom left panel below, very roughly resembling your data)
tab = create_data(n_samples)

# prepare training data
x_train = tab.iloc[:n_steps, 1:].values.T
x_train = x_train.reshape(*x_train.shape, 1)
y_train = tab.iloc[n_steps:, 1:].values.T
print(x_train.shape)  # (9, 50, 1) = old shape, 1D time series

# create additional dummy features to demonstrate usage of nD time series input data
# (feature_i = factor_i * score_i, with sum_i factor_i = 1)
feature_factors = [0.3, 0.2, 0.5]
x_train = np.dstack([x_train] + [factor*x_train for factor in feature_factors])
print(x_train.shape)  # (9, 50, 4) = new shape, original 1 + 3 new features

# create LSTM which predicts everything beyond n_steps
n_steps_out = len(tab) - n_steps
model, history = train_model(x_train, y_train, n_steps=n_steps, epochs=epochs,
                             n_steps_out=n_steps_out)

# prepare test data
x_test = tab.iloc[:n_steps, :1].values.T
x_test = x_test.reshape(*x_test.shape, 1)
x_test = np.dstack([x_test] + [factor*x_test for factor in feature_factors])
y_test = tab.iloc[n_steps:, :1].values.T[0]
y_pred = model.predict(x_test)[0]

# plot results
plot_multi(history, tab, y_pred, n_steps)

更新

您好 Shlomi,感谢您的更新。如果我理解正确,那么您将拥有更多功能,而不是一维时间序列,即 nD 时间序列。实际上,这已经包含在模型中(带有部分未定义的 n_features 变量,现已更正)。我在版本 B 中添加了“创建附加虚拟特征”部分,其中虚拟特征是通过拆分原始一维时间序列创建的(但也保留原始数据,对应于您的 f(...)=score,这听起来像一个工程应该有用的功能)。然后,我只在 LSTM 网络设置函数中添加了n_features = x_train.shape[2]。只需确保您的个人特征在将它们输入网络之前已正确缩放(例如 [0-1])。当然,预测质量很大程度上取决于实际数据。

辅助功能

def create_data(n_samples):
    # window width for rolling average
    window = 10
    # position of change in trend
    thres = 200
    # time period of interest
    dates = pd.date_range(start='2020-02-16', end='2020-03-15', freq='H')
    # create data frame
    tab = pd.DataFrame(index=dates)
    lend = len(tab)
    lin = np.arange(lend)
    # create synthetic time series
    for ids in range(n_samples):
        trend = 4 * lin - 3 * (lin-thres) * (lin > thres)
        # scale to [0, 1] interval (approximately) for easier handling by network
        trend = 0.9 * trend / max(trend)
        noise = 0.1 * (0.1 + trend) * np.random.randn(lend)
        vec = trend + noise
        tab[ids] = vec
    # compute rolling average to get smoother variation
    tab = tab.rolling(window=window).mean().iloc[window:]
    return tab


def split_sequence(vec, n_steps=20):
    # split sequence into chunks of given size
    x_trues, y_trues = [], []
    steps = len(vec) - n_steps
    for step in range(steps):
        ilo = step
        iup = step + n_steps
        x_true, y_true = vec[ilo:iup], vec[iup]
        x_trues.append(x_true)
        y_trues.append(y_true)
    x_true = np.array(x_trues)
    y_true = np.array(y_trues)
    return x_true, y_true


def prepare_data(tab, n_steps=20):
    # convert data frame with multiple columns into chucks
    x_trues, y_trues = [], []
    if tab.ndim == 2:
        arr = np.atleast_2d(tab).T
    else:
        arr = np.atleast_2d(tab)
    for col in arr:
        x_true, y_true = split_sequence(col, n_steps=n_steps)
        x_trues.append(x_true)
        y_trues.append(y_true)
    x_true = np.vstack(x_trues)
    x_true = x_true.reshape(*x_true.shape, 1)
    y_true = np.hstack(y_trues)
    return x_true, y_true


def train_model(x_train, y_train, n_units=50, n_steps=20, epochs=200,
                n_steps_out=1):
    # get number of features from input data
    n_features = x_train.shape[2]
    # setup network
    # (feel free to use other combination of layers and parameters here)
    model = keras.models.Sequential()
    model.add(keras.layers.LSTM(n_units, activation='relu',
                                return_sequences=True,
                                input_shape=(n_steps, n_features)))
    model.add(keras.layers.LSTM(n_units, activation='relu'))
    model.add(keras.layers.Dense(n_steps_out))
    model.compile(optimizer='adam', loss='mse', metrics=['mse'])
    # train network
    history = model.fit(x_train, y_train, epochs=epochs,
                        validation_split=0.1, verbose=1)
    return model, history


def predict_all(vec, model):
    # split data
    x_test, y_test = prepare_data(vec, n_steps=n_steps)
    # use trained model to predict all data points from preceeding chunk
    y_pred = model.predict(x_test, verbose=1)
    y_pred = np.hstack(y_pred)
    return y_test, y_pred


def predict_iterative(vec, n_steps, model):
    # use last chunk to predict next value, iterate until end is reached
    y_iter = vec.copy()
    lent = len(y_iter)
    steps = lent - n_steps - 1
    for step in range(steps):
        print(step, steps)
        ilo = step
        iup = step + n_steps + 1
        x_test, y_test = prepare_data(y_iter[ilo:iup], n_steps=n_steps)
        y_pred = model.predict(x_test, verbose=0)
        y_iter[iup] = y_pred
    return y_iter[n_steps:]


def plot_single(y_test, y_plots, n_steps, nrows=2):
    # prepare variables for plotting
    metric = 'mse'
    mima = [min(y_test), max(y_test)]
    titles = ['all', 'iterative']
    lin = np.arange(-n_steps, len(y_test))
    # create figure
    fig, axis = plt.subplots(figsize=(16, 9),
                             nrows=2, ncols=3)
    # plot time series
    axia = axis[1, 0]
    axia.set_title('original data')
    tab.plot(ax=axia)
    axia.set_xlabel('time')
    axia.set_ylabel('value')
    # plot network training history
    axia = axis[0, 0]
    axia.set_title('training history')
    axia.plot(history.history[metric], label='train')
    axia.plot(history.history['val_'+metric], label='test')
    axia.set_xlabel('epoch')
    axia.set_ylabel(metric)
    axia.set_yscale('log')
    plt.legend()
    # plot result for "all" and "iterative" prediction
    for idy, y_plot in enumerate(y_plots):
        # plot true/predicted time series
        axia = axis[idy, 1]
        axia.set_title(titles[idy])
        axia.plot(lin, veo, label='full')
        axia.plot(y_test, label='true')
        axia.plot(y_plot, label='predicted')
        plt.legend()
        axia.set_xlabel('time')
        axia.set_ylabel('value')
        axia.set_ylim(0, 1)
        # plot scatter plot of true/predicted data
        axia = axis[idy, 2]
        r2 = sklearn.metrics.r2_score(y_test, y_plot)
        axia.set_title('R2 = %.2f' % r2)
        axia.scatter(y_test, y_plot)
        axia.plot(mima, mima, color='black')
        axia.set_xlabel('true')
        axia.set_ylabel('predicted')
    plt.tight_layout()
    return None


def plot_multi(history, tab, y_pred, n_steps):
    # prepare variables for plotting
    metric = 'mse'
    # create figure
    fig, axis = plt.subplots(figsize=(16, 9),
                             nrows=1, ncols=2, squeeze=False)
    # plot network training history
    axia = axis[0, 0]
    axia.set_title('training history')
    axia.plot(history.history[metric], label='train')
    axia.plot(history.history['val_'+metric], label='test')
    axia.set_xlabel('epoch')
    axia.set_ylabel(metric)
    axia.set_yscale('log')
    plt.legend()
    # plot true/predicted time series
    axia = axis[0, 1]
    axia.plot(tab[0].values, label='true')
    axia.plot(range(n_steps, len(tab)), y_pred, label='predicted')
    plt.legend()
    axia.set_xlabel('time')
    axia.set_ylabel('value')
    axia.set_ylim(0, 1)
    plt.tight_layout()
    return None

【讨论】:

猜你喜欢
  • 1970-01-01
  • 2018-11-13
  • 2020-08-11
  • 1970-01-01
  • 2020-08-28
  • 1970-01-01
  • 1970-01-01
  • 2017-06-16
  • 2017-05-01
相关资源
最近更新 更多