【发布时间】:2016-11-14 06:06:34
【问题描述】:
我尝试使用批量标准化来使用 TensorFlow 训练我的神经网络,但我不清楚如何使用 the official layer implementation of Batch Normalization(注意这与 API 不同)。
在对他们的github issues 进行了一番痛苦的挖掘之后,似乎需要一个tf.cond 才能正确使用它,还需要一个“resue=True”标志,以便正确重用 BN shift 和 scale 变量。在弄清楚这一点后,我提供了一个简短的描述,说明我认为如何正确使用它here。
现在我写了一个简短的脚本来测试它(只有一个层和一个 ReLu,很难让它比这个更小)。但是,我不是 100% 确定如何测试它。现在我的代码运行时没有错误消息,但意外返回NaNs。这降低了我对我在另一篇文章中给出的代码可能是正确的信心。或者也许我拥有的网络很奇怪。无论哪种方式,有人知道出了什么问题吗?代码如下:
import tensorflow as tf
# download and install the MNIST data automatically
from tensorflow.examples.tutorials.mnist import input_data
from tensorflow.contrib.layers.python.layers import batch_norm as batch_norm
def batch_norm_layer(x,train_phase,scope_bn):
bn_train = batch_norm(x, decay=0.999, center=True, scale=True,
is_training=True,
reuse=None, # is this right?
trainable=True,
scope=scope_bn)
bn_inference = batch_norm(x, decay=0.999, center=True, scale=True,
is_training=False,
reuse=True, # is this right?
trainable=True,
scope=scope_bn)
z = tf.cond(train_phase, lambda: bn_train, lambda: bn_inference)
return z
def get_NN_layer(x, input_dim, output_dim, scope, train_phase):
with tf.name_scope(scope+'vars'):
W = tf.Variable(tf.truncated_normal(shape=[input_dim, output_dim], mean=0.0, stddev=0.1))
b = tf.Variable(tf.constant(0.1, shape=[output_dim]))
with tf.name_scope(scope+'Z'):
z = tf.matmul(x,W) + b
with tf.name_scope(scope+'BN'):
if train_phase is not None:
z = batch_norm_layer(z,train_phase,scope+'BN_unit')
with tf.name_scope(scope+'A'):
a = tf.nn.relu(z) # (M x D1) = (M x D) * (D x D1)
return a
mnist = input_data.read_data_sets("MNIST_data/", one_hot=True)
# placeholder for data
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 784])
# placeholder that turns BN during training or off during inference
train_phase = tf.placeholder(tf.bool, name='phase_train')
# variables for parameters
hiden_units = 25
layer1 = get_NN_layer(x, input_dim=784, output_dim=hiden_units, scope='layer1', train_phase=train_phase)
# create model
W_final = tf.Variable(tf.truncated_normal(shape=[hiden_units, 10], mean=0.0, stddev=0.1))
b_final = tf.Variable(tf.constant(0.1, shape=[10]))
y = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(layer1, W_final) + b_final)
### training
y_ = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 10])
cross_entropy = tf.reduce_mean( -tf.reduce_sum(y_ * tf.log(y), reduction_indices=[1]) )
train_step = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.5).minimize(cross_entropy)
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(tf.initialize_all_variables())
steps = 3000
for iter_step in xrange(steps):
#feed_dict_batch = get_batch_feed(X_train, Y_train, M, phase_train)
batch_xs, batch_ys = mnist.train.next_batch(100)
# Collect model statistics
if iter_step%1000 == 0:
batch_xstrain, batch_xstrain = batch_xs, batch_ys #simualtes train data
batch_xcv, batch_ycv = mnist.test.next_batch(5000) #simualtes CV data
batch_xtest, batch_ytest = mnist.test.next_batch(5000) #simualtes test data
# do inference
train_error = sess.run(fetches=cross_entropy, feed_dict={x: batch_xs, y_:batch_ys, train_phase: False})
cv_error = sess.run(fetches=cross_entropy, feed_dict={x: batch_xcv, y_:batch_ycv, train_phase: False})
test_error = sess.run(fetches=cross_entropy, feed_dict={x: batch_xtest, y_:batch_ytest, train_phase: False})
def do_stuff_with_errors(*args):
print args
do_stuff_with_errors(train_error, cv_error, test_error)
# Run Train Step
sess.run(fetches=train_step, feed_dict={x: batch_xs, y_:batch_ys, train_phase: True})
# list of booleans indicating correct predictions
correct_prediction = tf.equal(tf.argmax(y,1), tf.argmax(y_,1))
# accuracy
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_prediction, tf.float32))
print(sess.run(accuracy, feed_dict={x: mnist.test.images, y_: mnist.test.labels, train_phase: False}))
当我运行它时,我得到:
Extracting MNIST_data/train-images-idx3-ubyte.gz
Extracting MNIST_data/train-labels-idx1-ubyte.gz
Extracting MNIST_data/t10k-images-idx3-ubyte.gz
Extracting MNIST_data/t10k-labels-idx1-ubyte.gz
(2.3474066, 2.3498712, 2.3461707)
(0.49414295, 0.88536006, 0.91152304)
(0.51632041, 0.393666, nan)
0.9296
过去所有最后一个都是 nan,现在只有几个。一切都很好还是我偏执?
【问题讨论】:
-
在stackoverflow.com/questions/33949786/… 中查看我的答案。当我最初尝试它时,我在损失函数中也偶尔有一个 NaN,我解决了 2 个问题:1)降低了学习率 2)确保对每个层执行批量标准化。意思是我批量归一化隐藏层的输入和隐藏层的输出。
-
如果我使用类似:with tf.name_scope('batch_norm'),是否仍然需要将范围变量传递给 batch_norm 函数?
标签: python tensorflow machine-learning neural-network conv-neural-network