这是一个迭代的 Cython 版本,如果这是一个严重的瓶颈,这可能是你最好的选择
# saved as file count_leading_zeros.pyx
import numpy as np
cimport numpy as np
cimport cython
DTYPE = np.int
ctypedef np.int_t DTYPE_t
@cython.boundscheck(False)
def count_leading_zeros(np.ndarray[DTYPE_t, ndim=1] a):
cdef int elements = a.size
cdef int i = 0
cdef int count = 0
while i < elements:
if a[i] == 0:
count += 1
else:
return count
i += 1
return count
这类似于@mtrw 的答案,但以本机速度进行索引。我的 Cython 有点粗略,因此可能需要进一步改进。
用几种不同的方法用 IPython 快速测试一个非常有利的案例
In [1]: import numpy as np
In [2]: import pyximport; pyximport.install()
Out[2]: (None, <pyximport.pyximport.PyxImporter at 0x53e9250>)
In [3]: import count_leading_zeros
In [4]: %paste
def count_leading_zeros_python(x):
ctr = 0
for k in x:
if k == 0:
ctr += 1
else:
return ctr
return ctr
## -- End pasted text --
In [5]: a = np.zeros((10000000,), dtype=np.int)
In [6]: a[5] = 1
In [7]:
In [7]: %timeit np.min(np.nonzero(np.hstack((a, 1))))
10 loops, best of 3: 91.1 ms per loop
In [8]:
In [8]: %timeit np.where(a)[0][0] if np.shape(np.where(a)[0])[0] != 0 else np.shape(a)[0]
10 loops, best of 3: 107 ms per loop
In [9]:
In [9]: %timeit count_leading_zeros_python(a)
100000 loops, best of 3: 3.87 µs per loop
In [10]:
In [10]: %timeit count_leading_zeros.count_leading_zeros(a)
1000000 loops, best of 3: 489 ns per loop
但是,如果我有证据(使用分析器)证明这是一个瓶颈,我只会使用这样的东西。许多事情可能看起来效率低下,但永远不值得你花时间去解决。