另一种访问列表的第一个和第二个元素的方法也是通过str:
In [174]: coords = pd.Series([
.....: '(29.65271977700047, -82.33086252299967)',
.....: '(29.652914019000434, -82.42682220199964)',
.....: '(29.65301114200048, -82.36455186899968)',
.....: '(29.642610841000476, -82.29853169599966)'])
In [175]: str_coords = coords.str[1:-1].str.split(', ')
In [176]: coords_df = pd.DataFrame({'lat': str_coords.str[0], 'lon': str_coords.str[1]})
In [177]: coords_df.astype(float).head()
Out[177]:
lat lon
0 29.652720 -82.330863
1 29.652914 -82.426822
2 29.653011 -82.364552
3 29.642611 -82.298532
4 29.652720 -82.330863
一些时间表明我的解决方案和@ajcr 的解决方案都比 apply(pd.Series) 方法快得多(两者之间的差异可以忽略不计):
In [197]: coords = pd.Series([
.....: '(29.65271977700047, -82.33086252299967)',
.....: '(29.652914019000434, -82.42682220199964)',
.....: '(29.65301114200048, -82.36455186899968)',
.....: '(29.642610841000476, -82.29853169599966)'])
In [198]: coords = pd.concat([coords]*1000, ignore_index=True)
In [199]: %%timeit
.....: str_coords = coords.str[1:-1].str.split(', ')
.....: df_coords = pd.DataFrame({'lat': str_coords.str[0], 'lon': str_coords.str[1]}, dtype=float)
.....:
100 loops, best of 3: 14.1 ms per loop
In [200]: %%timeit
.....: str_coords = coords.str[1:-1].str.split(', ')
.....: df_coords = str_coords.apply(pd.Series).astype(float)
.....:
1 loops, best of 3: 821 ms per loop
In [201]: %%timeit
.....: df_coords = coords.str.extract(r'\((?P<lat>[\d\.]+),\s+(?P<lon>[^()\s,]+)\)')
.....: df_coords.astype(float)
.....:
100 loops, best of 3: 16.2 ms per loop