【发布时间】:2015-07-09 03:06:43
【问题描述】:
我一直在使用 Scala 中的类型类模式,但我无法弄清楚当我使用的类型是泛型时如何实现隐式伴随对象。
例如,假设我为一个类型类定义了一个特征,它提供了将事物放入Boxes 的函数。
case class Box[A](value: A)
trait Boxer[A] {
def box(instance: A): Box[A]
def unbox(box: Box[A]): A
}
implicit object IntBoxer extends Boxer[Int] {
def box(instance: Int) = Box(instance)
def unbox(box: Box[Int]) = box.value
}
def box[A : Boxer](value: A) = implicitly[Boxer[A]].box(value)
def unbox[A : Boxer](box: Box[A]) = implicitly[Boxer[A]].unbox(box)
这按预期工作,允许我为各种类型提供Boxer 的实现。但是,当我希望操作的类型本身是泛型时,我不知道如何执行此操作。假设我希望能够在任何Seq[A] 上使用我的Boxer。 Scala 中的objects 不能包含类型参数,所以我不知道该去哪里:
// Will not compile - object cannot have type arguments
implicit object SeqBoxer[A] extends Boxer[Seq[A]] { ... }
// Will not compile - 'A' is unrecognized
implicit object SeqBoxer extends Boxer[Seq[A]] { ... }
// Compiles but fails on execution, as this doesn't implement an implicit
// conversion for _specific_ instances of Seq
implicit object SeqBoxer extends Boxer[Seq[_]] {
def box(instance: Seq[_]) = Box(instance)
def unbox(box: Box[Seq[_]]) = box.value
}
// Will not compile - doesn't technically implement Boxer[Seq[_]]
implicit object SeqBoxer extends Boxer[Seq[_]] {
def box[A](instance: Seq[A]) = Box(instance)
def unbox[A](box: Box[Seq[A]]) = box.value
}
// Compiles, but won't resolve with 'implicitly[Boxer[Seq[Foo]]]'
// I had high hopes for this one, too :(
implicit def seqBoxer[A]() = new Boxer[Seq[A]] {
def box(instance: Seq[A]) = Box(instance)
def unbox(box: Box[Seq[A]]) = box.value
}
有没有什么方法可以支持泛型类型的隐式转换,而不必为每个内部类型隐式单独的对象?
【问题讨论】:
标签: scala generics implicit-conversion typeclass implicit