max-age, no-Cache,must-revalidate on Cache-Control Header，这里优先考虑哪个？

【问题标题】：max-age, no-Cache,must-revalidate on Cache-Control Header, Which takes predence here?max-age, no-Cache,must-revalidate on Cache-Control Header，这里优先考虑哪个？
【发布时间】：2015-02-14 09:59:57
【问题描述】：

Cache-Control : max-age=86400, no-store, must-revalidate, no-cache

这是服务器为 JS 文件设置的响应头。

这是否意味着响应在重新验证之前缓存了 86400 秒？

以上哪一项优先，结果是什么？

【问题讨论】：

标签： http caching http-headers response-headers

【解决方案1】：

看起来 no-cache 优先于所有。 HTTP1.1 规范说“If the no-cache directive does not specify a field-name, then a cache MUST NOT use the response to satisfy a subsequent request without successful revalidation with the origin server.” 参考http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.9.1

它还显示“The max-age directive on a response implies that the response is cacheable (i.e., "public") unless some other, more restrictive cache directive is also present.” 参考http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.9.3

以上都是针对 HTTP/1.1 的。

【讨论】：