【发布时间】:2015-11-02 00:32:50
【问题描述】:
我在开始线程的地方有以下方法测试:
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
List<Thread> threads = new ArrayList<>();
final CyclicBarrier cyclicBarrier = new CyclicBarrier(1);
Thread thread = new Thread(new CallbackThread(cyclicBarrier, threads));
threads.add(thread);
thread.start();
}
CallBack 线程如下所示:
class CallbackThread implements Runnable {
CyclicBarrier cyclicBarrier;
List<Thread> threads;
CallbackThread(CyclicBarrier cyclicBarrier, List<Thread> threads) {
this.cyclicBarrier = cyclicBarrier;
this.threads = threads;
}
@Override
public void run() {
try {
cyclicBarrier.await();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace(); //To change body of catch statement use File | Settings | File Templates.
} catch (BrokenBarrierException e) {
e.printStackTrace(); //To change body of catch statement use File | Settings | File Templates.
}
System.out.println("Threads started");
for (Thread thread1 : threads) {
try {
thread1.join();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace(); //To change body of catch statement use File | Settings | File Templates.
}
}
System.out.println("Threads finished");
}
}
当我运行应用程序时,我看到以下输出:
Threads started
应用程序挂起。
我不明白为什么。
如果将连接逻辑替换为 main 方法 - 一切顺利。
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
List<Thread> threads = new ArrayList<>();
final CyclicBarrier cyclicBarrier = new CyclicBarrier(1);
Thread thread = new Thread(new CallbackThread(cyclicBarrier, threads));
threads.add(thread);
thread.start();
for (Thread thread1 : threads) {
try {
thread1.join();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace(); //To change body of catch statement use File | Settings | File Templates.
}
}
System.out.println("Threads finished");
}
你能解释一下这个区别吗?
恕我直言,它应该可以工作。
【问题讨论】:
-
您不应添加新问题,而应编辑此问题以给出正确的示例。我已投票结束您的新问题并将其标记为供版主注意。
-
@Narendra Pathai 实际上我应该删除这个问题,但我不能,因为它有答案
-
@Narendra Pathai 认真阅读。它不是重复的
标签: java multithreading concurrency cyclicbarrier