【发布时间】:2020-05-31 17:04:41
【问题描述】:
我已经编写了一个链表(针对数据类型 int)实现。 当我尝试对列表进行排序时,似乎工作正常 except 元素应该排在所有偶数元素之后,并保留偶数和奇数的原始顺序。
在 MS Visual Studio 中调试时,我发现在 oddevenSort() 函数中,for 循环似乎在无限进行……好像不知何故 tail->next 没有更新为 nullptr。
我似乎无法理解我的逻辑错误在哪里。
#include<iostream>
template<class T>
class SLL_Node
{
public:
T info;
SLL_Node* next;
SLL_Node();
SLL_Node(T el, SLL_Node<T>* n = nullptr);
};
template<class T>
class SLL
{
private:
SLL_Node<T>* head, * tail;
size_t size;
public:
SLL();
~SLL();
bool isEmpty() const;
size_t get_size() const;
void add_to_head(T el);
void add_to_tail(T el);
void delete_at(size_t); //delete at a certain index. Index starting from 1. Throws an error //message if index out of bounds or list empty.
void display()const; //the logic is for mostly primitive data types and not user defined data //types (including classes)
void oddevenSort();
};
template<class T>
bool SLL<T>::isEmpty() const
{
if (tail == nullptr)
return true;
else
return false;
}
template<class T>
SLL_Node<T>::SLL_Node() : next{ nullptr }
{}
template<class T>
SLL_Node<T>::SLL_Node(T el, SLL_Node<T>* n) : info{ el }, next{ n }
{}
template<class T>
SLL<T>::SLL()
{
size = 0;
head = tail = nullptr;
}
template<class T>
void SLL<T>::add_to_tail(T el)
{
++size;
if (!isEmpty())
{
tail->next = new SLL_Node<T>(el);
tail = tail->next;
}
else
head = tail = new SLL_Node<T>(el);
}
template<class T>
void SLL<T>::add_to_head(T el)
{
head = new SLL_Node<T>(el, head);
if (tail == nullptr) //if empty
{
tail = head;
}
++size;
}
template<class T>
void SLL<T>::display()const
{
std::cout << '\n';
for (SLL_Node<T>* tmp{ head }; tmp != nullptr; tmp = tmp->next)
{
std::cout << tmp->info << "->";
}
std::cout << "NULL\n";
}
template<class T>
void SLL<T>::delete_at(size_t index)
{
if (index >= 1 && index <= size) //bound checking
{
if (!isEmpty()) //we dont need is empty since size takes care of that but still adding it for clarity
{
if (head == tail && index == 1) //if list only has one node and we delete head node
{
delete head;
head = tail = nullptr;
}
//otherwise if list more than one node
else if (index == 1) //if deleting head node
{
SLL_Node<T>* tmp{ head };
head = head->next;
delete tmp;
tmp = nullptr;
}
else //deleting other nodes
{
SLL_Node<T>* tmp{ head->next }, * pred{ head };
for (size_t i{ 2 }; i < index; ++i)
{
tmp = tmp->next;
pred = pred->next;
}
pred->next = tmp->next;
if (tmp == tail)
{
tail = pred;
}
delete tmp;
tmp = nullptr;
}
}
}
else
{
std::cout<<"\nError! Either the list is empty or the index entered is out of bounds!\n";
}
}
template<class T>
void SLL<T>::oddevenSort()
{
SLL_Node<T>* t=head;
size_t count{1};
for (; t != nullptr; t = t->next)
{
if (((t->info) % 2) != 0)
{
add_to_tail(t->info);
delete_at(count);
}
++count;
}
}
主要:
int main()
{
SLL<int> a;
a.add_to_head(1);
a.add_to_head(2);
a.add_to_tail(3);
a.add_to_tail(4);
a.add_to_head(6);
a.add_to_tail(7);
a.add_to_head(5);
a.display();
//a.oddevenSort();
a.display();
return 0;
}
【问题讨论】:
-
delete_at(count);这不会导致t指向的问题吗? -
@drescherjm 我现在添加了
delete_at()定义。请看一下 -
问题不在于 delete_at() 它是
t指向的。您删除 t 指向的节点,然后尝试在已删除的节点上执行t = t->next -
那么在调用
delete_at(count)之前我应该先t=t->next吗? -
你可能不应该在这个函数中使用 delete_at()。并从 for (;;) 中删除
t = t->next,而是将t = t->next放在循环体中,并且仅在不删除时使用它。
标签: c++ sorting infinite-loop singly-linked-list