除了优雅之外,您可能还需要考虑跨类型而不是 String 的速度和可重用性。为了优雅,我建议使用扩展方法来抽象出细节,以便常见用法看起来像:
ns = sa.Join(" * ");
为了提高速度,请考虑以下变体测试,包括其他回答问题的人提出的一些解决方案:
public void Test_variants()
{
const string item = "a";
const int numberOfTimes = 100000;
const string delimiter = ", ";
string[] items = new List<string>(Enumerable.Repeat(item, numberOfTimes)).ToArray();
string expected = String.Join(delimiter, items);
Time(StringJoin, items, delimiter, expected);
Time(Aggregate, items, delimiter, expected);
Time(CheckForEndInsideLoop_String, items, delimiter, expected);
Time(CheckForBeginningInsideLoop_String, items, delimiter, expected);
Time(RemoveFinalDelimiter_String, items, delimiter, expected);
Time(CheckForEndInsideLoop_StringBuilder, items, delimiter, expected);
Time(RemoveFinalDelimiter_StringBuilder, items, delimiter, expected);
}
private static void Time(Func<string[], string, string> func, string[] items, string delimiter, string expected)
{
Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
stopwatch.Start();
string result = func(items, delimiter);
stopwatch.Stop();
bool isValid = result == expected;
Console.WriteLine("{0}\t{1}\t{2}", stopwatch.Elapsed, isValid, func.Method.Name);
}
private static string CheckForEndInsideLoop_String(string[] items, string delimiter)
{
string result = "";
for (int i = 0; i < items.Length; i++)
{
result += items[i];
if (i != items.Length - 1)
{
result += delimiter;
}
}
return result;
}
private static string RemoveFinalDelimiter_String(string[] items, string delimiter)
{
string result = "";
for (int i = 0; i < items.Length; i++)
{
result += items[i] + delimiter;
}
return result.Substring(0, result.Length - delimiter.Length);
}
private static string CheckForBeginningInsideLoop_String(string[] items, string delimiter)
{
string result = "";
foreach (string s in items)
{
if (result.Length != 0)
{
result += delimiter;
}
result += s;
}
return result;
}
private static string CheckForEndInsideLoop_StringBuilder(string[] items, string delimiter)
{
StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < items.Length; i++)
{
result.Append(items[i]);
if (i != items.Length - 1)
{
result.Append(delimiter);
}
}
return result.ToString();
}
private static string RemoveFinalDelimiter_StringBuilder(string[] items, string delimiter)
{
StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < items.Length; i++)
{
result.Append(items[i]);
result.Append(delimiter);
}
result.Length = result.Length - delimiter.Length;
return result.ToString();
}
private static string StringJoin(string[] items, string delimiter)
{
return String.Join(delimiter, items);
}
private static string Aggregate(string[] items, string delimiter)
{
return items.Aggregate((c, s) => c + delimiter + s);
}
我的盒子上的结果如下:
00:00:00.0027745 真正的字符串连接
00:00:24.5523967 真正的聚合
00:00:47.8091632 True CheckForEndInsideLoop_String
00:00:47.4682981 真正的 CheckForBeginningInsideLoop_String
00:00:23.7972864 True RemoveFinalDelimiter_String
00:00:00.0076439 真正的 CheckForEndInsideLoop_StringBuilder
00:00:00.0052803 True RemoveFinalDelimiter_StringBuilder
这意味着,如果您只使用字符串数组,最好的选择是 String.Join,紧随其后的是 StringBuilder 变体。请注意,在使用字符串时检查循环内的最后一项会比使用 StringBuilder 时产生更大的差异。当要分隔的项目列表很小时,基于字符串的实现的性能也有很大提高。我将 numberOfItems 设置为 10 进行了相同的测试,并收到了以下结果:
00:00:00.0001788 真正的字符串连接
00:00:00.0014983 真实聚合
00:00:00.0001666 True CheckForEndInsideLoop_String
00:00:00.0002202 True CheckForBeginningInsideLoop_String
00:00:00.0002061 True RemoveFinalDelimiter_String
00:00:00.0002663 True CheckForEndInsideLoop_StringBuilder
00:00:00.0002278 True RemoveFinalDelimiter_StringBuilder
您可能要考虑的下一件事是可重用性。如果您想从由分隔符分隔的整数列表构建字符串,则 String.Join 仅在您对每个整数运行 .ToString() 并创建字符串数组后才可以选择(因为 String.Join 无法对 IEnumerable 进行操作)。
因此,总而言之,您可以考虑使用以下几行的扩展方法来获得优雅、速度和可重用性的良好组合:
public static string Join<T>([CanBeNull] this IEnumerable<T> items, [CanBeNull] string delimiter)
{
StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder();
if (items != null && items.Any())
{
delimiter = delimiter ?? "";
foreach (T item in items)
{
result.Append(item);
result.Append(delimiter);
}
result.Length = result.Length - delimiter.Length;
}
return result.ToString();
}
用法:
ns = sa.Join(" * ");