【发布时间】:2021-06-13 18:45:22
【问题描述】:
我正在实现一个words/2 谓词,其中可以将字符列表呈现为字符列表作为列表中的单词。我使用数学符号<=> 表示它们在任何模式下工作。有没有更好的表达方式请指教。
例子:
?- words([p,r,o,l,o,g,' ',i,s,' ',g,o,o,d],Y).
Y = [[p,r,o,l,o,g],[i,s],[g,o,o,d]]
?- words(X,[[p,r,o,l,o,g],[i,s],[g,o,o,d]]).
X = [p,r,o,l,o,g,' ',i,s,' ',g,o,o,d]
我所做的是尝试使用append/3,如下所示,尝试将空字符串放在两者之间,并将它们连接在一起。并用NewCharList 递归List,但由于“超出本地堆栈”而失败。
% base case, empty list
words([],[]).
% X is a list of characters
% Y is a list with characters list as a word
words(CharList,[WordList|List]):-
append(WordList,[' '],NewWord),
append(NewWord,CharList,NewCharList),
words(NewCharList,List).
如何改进代码?谢谢。
编辑1 来自@rajashekar 的百万感谢。现在我明白了代码
% base case
split(_, [], [[]]).
% when the the element list of Ys is empty
% add a C to the Xs, in this case, C is a empty string ' '
split(C, [C|Xs], [[]|Ys]) :-
split(C, Xs, Ys).
% put the X character from [X|Y] list to Xs
% and goes on next word list
split(C, [X|Xs], [[X|Y]|Ys]) :-
split(C, Xs, [Y|Ys]).
但在我的 SWI 序言中,这似乎很奇怪:
?-split(' ', X, [[p,r,o,l,o,g],[i,s],[g,o,o,d]]).
X = [p, r, o, l, o, g, ' ', i, s|...]
这是跟踪记录:
[trace] ?- split(X, [[p,r,o,l,o,g],[i,s],[g,o,o,d]]).
Call: (10) split(_5702, [[p, r, o, l, o, g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (11) split(_6210, [[r, o, l, o, g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (12) split(_6266, [[o, l, o, g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (13) split(_6322, [[l, o, g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (14) split(_6378, [[o, g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (15) split(_6434, [[g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (16) split(_6490, [[], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (17) split(_6546, [[i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (18) split(_6596, [[s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (19) split(_6652, [[], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (20) split(_6708, [[g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (21) split(_6758, [[o, o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (22) split(_6814, [[o, d]]) ? creep
Call: (23) split(_6870, [[d]]) ? creep
Call: (24) split(_6926, [[]]) ? creep
Exit: (24) split([], [[]]) ? creep
Exit: (23) split([d], [[d]]) ? creep
Exit: (22) split([o, d], [[o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (21) split([o, o, d], [[o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (20) split([g, o, o, d], [[g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (19) split([' ', g, o, o, d], [[], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (18) split([s, ' ', g, o, o, d], [[s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (17) split([i, s, ' ', g, o, o, d], [[i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (16) split([' ', i, s, ' ', g, o, o, d], [[], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (15) split([g, ' ', i, s, ' ', g, o, o|...], [[g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (14) split([o, g, ' ', i, s, ' ', g, o|...], [[o, g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (13) split([l, o, g, ' ', i, s, ' ', g|...], [[l, o, g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (12) split([o, l, o, g, ' ', i, s, ' '|...], [[o, l, o, g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (11) split([r, o, l, o, g, ' ', i, s|...], [[r, o, l, o, g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
Exit: (10) split([p, r, o, l, o, g, ' ', i|...], [[p, r, o, l, o, g], [i, s], [g, o, o, d]]) ? creep
X = [p, r, o, l, o, g, ' ', i, s|...] .
EDIT2
我发现使用! (cut) 可以减少回溯。
% base case
split(_, [], [[]]).
% when the the element list of Ys is empty
% add a C to the Xs, in this case, C is a empty string ' '
split(C, [C|Xs], [[]|Ys]) :-
split(C, Xs, Ys),!.
% put the X character from [X|Y] list to Xs
% and goes on next word list
split(C, [X|Xs], [[X|Y]|Ys]) :-
split(C, Xs, [Y|Ys]),!.
【问题讨论】:
-
使用dcg-notation!
-
@false 谢谢你的建议。我从 amzi.com/manuals/amzi/pro/ref_dcg.htm 中找到了一个 DCG 示例,例如
sentence(s(S,V,O)) --> subject(S), verb(V), object(O).。在这个例子中,我如何表达数学上主语、动词和宾语也可以组成一个句子的模式,其中关系是双向的? -
按
w键让SWI显示完整答案 -
@gusbro 谢谢!有用。但是由于有实现的测试用例,我只能写谓词。